Latest Squeal from a AGW Cultist Wounded
DECONSTRUCTING “PIG-IGNORANT”
Apparently, a Firedoglake poster got his panties in a wad when the Utah House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution urging the EPA to ditch its man-made CO2 regulations.
In this case, “pig ignorant” equals “I disagree with you, but have a hard time stating why my opinion is more settled than yours.”
From Late Night: Utah House of Representatives Declares Itself Gang of Pig-Ignorant (go to link if you want to see their links in the paragraph):
The biggest problem with 21st Century Conservatism isn’t so much that so many 21st Century are running around like absolute morons. No, the problem is that they are proud to be running around like absolute morons. Examples, of course, abound. But few spectacles illustrate the point more luridly than the Utah House of Representatives deciding to, essentially, stick an ostrich feather up its collective ass and wiggle it around in what it fondly imagines to be an insulting manner at Science.
What is it about the Left’s inability to disagree without dragging sexual visuals into it? First, it was “teabagger” for the Tea Party movement, now it’s substituting an ostrich feather for use in some sort of political colonoscopy fantasy.
The author, “thers”, even takes poor Don Surber to task because the prolific Poca-ite has the cojones to disagree with the Mighty thers?
thers’ bio states that he is “A community college professor from upstate NY. My wife & I have 347 children, all of them rotten.”
No word if thers and his wife have a stock of ostrich feathers handy.
Here’s an ass reference for the prof: If I’m one of those “347 children” and thers’ piece is a sample of what I’m getting in the classroom, I’m suing his ass for educational malpractice.
This is, unfortunately, thers’ unlucky day. Phil Jones is admitting that, gee, the science is not so settled after all–to say the least.
Leaving thers and the rest of the warming cultists hanging out to dry.
No word if their “collective ass” is covered yet or not.
NOTE: Surber replies:
“I’m so old, I remember when the watermelons (green on the outside, red in the middle) were mocking me for not believing in global cooling when it was 20 below in Cleveland.”
I remember that too.
Old cult, same as the new cult.
UPDATE: Hot Air highlights a story by the Times of London in Was there any actual warming to begin with?
The Times of London delivers a separate blow to the AGW movement today in a report on scientific review of the data used to claim man-made warming of the planet over the last few decades. Several researchers have found that the measurements of temperatures in the AGW record that showed temperature increases mainly came from land development and urbanization, not from actual temperature increases. They have made their findings public through peer-reviewed studies that come at a very bad time for the IPCC and AGW advocates:
Waiting for a response from thers that doesn’t include the hurling of invective. This may be an impossible handicap for the good professor: from looking at his FDL piece, he no doubt teaches rhetoric instead of science.
And poorly, at that.
UPDATE: Mark Steyn was even more astonished at CRU’s Phil Jones’ AGW about-face: Decline and Phil, and cites the following, revealing story from the UK Daily Mail.
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.
[...]
Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
We’ll have the good manners not to tell ‘thers’ where to put that information so it tickles.
Sphere: Related Content
















