Real Men: Why Liberals Aren’t Real Men
Real Men
Rush Limbaugh recently made the case that real men aren’t liberals and don’t even vote for liberals. Nancy Morgan agrees and has a list of reasons why.
Nancy Morgan
RightBias.com
August 16, 2010
Rush Limbaugh stated emphatically last week that “Real men aren’t liberal. And real men, real men, don’t vote for liberals.” Rush, once again, hits the nail on the head. And here’s why.
Real men have an innate sense of self that is not dependent on group approval. They have not succumbed to the sanitized, homogenized, and feminized version of manhood that the academic, media, and political elite have adopted. Instead, they have the courage to form their own opinions, relying on independent thinking instead of political correctness.
Liberal males, on the other hand, have taken the much easier path of allowing a group identity to define who they are. They have willingly adopted the leftists’ focus on feelings and emotions when confronted with immutable facts, thus allowing them the ability to retain the all-important moral high ground when those facts prove inconvenient.
Liberal males allow the left to define the issues and set the rules. These rules allow them to claim morality, compassion, and virtue the easy way – by voting to spend someone else’s money on whomever the left designates as the latest “victim” group.
As an added bonus, liberal males are allowed to define their own reality, under the guise of “empowerment.” They are not held accountable when the policies they vote for fail. They are judged on intentions instead of outcomes.
Real men have chosen the harder path of relying on themselves to provide for themselves and their families. They have learned through experience that relying on government is a losing proposition. They know what liberal males don’t – that government is the source of their problems, not the solution. And they vote accordingly.
Liberal males have chosen to follow the rule of man instead of the rule of God because, as Russian novelist Feodor Dostoyevsky once said: “If there is no God, everything is permitted.” Real men choose to follow the rule of God. Guess which path is easier?
Liberal males have adopted the leftist notion that they are more “evolved” than Joe-Six Pack and Susy Homemaker. They have been told that they have a lock on moral superiority and compassion. They are free to focus on rights while ignoring responsibilities. After all, that is what Uncle Sam is for. Right?
Real men know that their role is to provide for their families and protect their country. If they fail, they take responsibility. Liberal males, however, have succumbed to comforting group-think that assigns no blame (except to conservatives) for failure. Whew! They have bought into the liberal fantasy that men and women are equal and alike, that all cultures are equal, and that nothing is ever their fault. And they will consistently vote for any politician who validates this concept for them.
Real men don’t vote for liberals. Real men, when facing a problem, solve it. They don’t form a commission to investigate. Real men accept reality and work to improve it. Liberal males seek to merely redefine it.
Try this simple exercise: Picture President Obama as a grunt on the front lines of a battle in Afghanistan, shooting at the enemy, and fighting for America. That image doesn’t compute, does it? In a nutshell, this is the difference between liberal males and real men.
Real men know that terrorists threaten our very existence. Liberal males choose to believe they are merely misunderstood victims of America’s excesses. Real men know that feelings count for zilch when faced with evil. Liberal males have bought into the notion that real evil exists only on the right.
Real men have actually earned the self-esteem the left believes is their exclusive right to bestow. By their very actions, real men expose the fallacy of liberalism.
Throughout history, real men like Ronald Reagan, Winston Churchill and George Patton have come to the rescue when liberal’s touchy feeley “Can’t we all just get along?” policies have failed. For this, they have been roundly denounced by the left. What was their sin? They were right.
Just as Rush Limbaugh was right when he claimed that real men aren’t liberal.
by Nancy Morgan
image: Right Bias
Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for conservative news site RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina
Author Bio
Article may be reprinted, with the above attribution
[...] everything is permitted.” Real men choose to follow the rule of God. Guess which path is easier? http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2010/08/real-men-why-liberals-arent-real-men/ Commenters who threaten anyone while here because they are not smart enough to come up [...]
george bush jr dodged vietnam
Reply
What a load of pandering crap. String together a bunch of fluffy straw men and then show us how tough you are by knocking them down.
That’s a pussy move, a sucker punch and then you act all tough and shit. You and Rush, some mouthy chick and a fat gas bag, yep, why don’t you tell me what a real man is.
If this kind of hot air keeps you up, then you lose.
Reply
“You and Rush, some mouthy chick and a fat gas bag, yep, why don’t you tell me what a real man is.”
A real man has enough respect for himself, and others, that he frames his opinions and/or dissent in a factual manner, without having to resort to filthy language and juvenile name calling.
Any more questions?
Reply
“george bush jr dodged vietnam”
Says who? Haven’t you heard? Dan Rather’s documents purporting to show that were found to be fake.
I assume you’re a leftists because you accept unfounded allegations as fact.
Any proof for your allegation?
Reply
frankly, ma’am, i see absolutely zero reasons why any of your trite arguments should be afforded any semblance of respect.
i was also highly amused that you actually felt it necessary to respond to the commenter who used the “foul” language… the best you could do was a more grown up version of “i know you are, but what am i?”
i also find it a bit funny that i found this site while using ‘stumbleupon’… i wasn’t aware astrology fell under the science umbrella these days. yet, it makes perfect sense after looking at the rest of the topics on this page.
may the Flying Spaghetti Monster, in all His Noodly Glory, forgive your blasphemous transgressions against his Saucey Magnificence and continue to let you dwell in the land of stripper factories and beer volcanoes. hasta, wing-nut.
Reply
[...] shy about praying over their meals and Sundays are for church going. MORE Nancy Morgan at DBKP: * Real Men: Why Liberals Aren’t Real Men * Neal Boortz Rebuttal: Sexuality Not Ordained in the Womb * Traitorous Media, Feckless Obama [...]
Haha! Wow.
You must be the only so-called writer I have ever seen try and defend their work in the comments. Speaks volumes.
Demeaning people should heal this great country. God bless.
Reply
Jdog,
I’m aware that leftists expect their words to go unchallenged, thus they never bother to reply and defend the veracity of their words.
I must be the first conservative writer you’ve ever encountered. We make sure that we print facts – or make sure to label opinion as such.
Call me a nasty profiler – but I would put odds on you being one of the leftists I speak about in above article.
Reply