Investing–The New Rules: Get the Odds on Your Side
You Don’t Want to Be the Gambler, You Want to Be the House
If you follow a Buy-and-Hold strategy, you are the gambler. Do gamblers sometimes win? They do indeed. But you don’t want to be the gambler, you want to be the house. Is there a way for the stock investor to get the odds on his side? There is.
You want the odds on your side.
If you follow a Buy-and-Hold strategy, you are the gambler. Do gamblers sometimes win? They do indeed. And Buy-and-Hold generated great returns in the late 1990s.
But you don’t want to be the gambler, you want to be the house. Is there a way for the stock investor to get the odds on his side? Is there a way to be sure that you won’t occasionally win some but then give most of the winnings back later on, to insure that over the long run you will almost certainly end up a winner?
There is.
Actually, there are two ways to do this.
The first way is the Warren Buffett way. Buffett studies the companies he invests in for a long time before putting money on the table. He passes up all possibilities until he finds one that puts the odds strongly in his favor. Then he patiently waits for the probabilities to assert themselves.
He doesn’t win every bet any more than the house in a casino wins every bet. But he never sweats it. Like the house, Buffett knows in advance that the odds are on his side. His long-term edge gives him the feeling of confidence that makes investing fun.
There’s only one problem with the Buffett approach. It’s hard. It takes a lot of work. Most of us don’t have the time or skill or energy to pull it off. We are better off not trying.
Fortunately for us lazybones types, there is a second way that works almost as well. The reason why the Buffett approach is so much work is that there are a hundred factors that can determine whether a company is successful for not. If you miss one factor and it turns out to be important, there goes your hope of being the house and not the gambler. We lazybones types need an approach to getting the odds on our side that only requires us to check out a single factor and then permits us to roll over and go back to sleep.
We’ve got it!
It’s called indexing. When you buy an index fund, you are buying a share of the productivity of the entire U.S. economy. You don’t need to bother figuring out whether a company has good management or a competitive edge or is sufficiently capitalized or any of that other boring junk. It’s always going to be the case that some of the companies in the U.S. economy are going to have good management and that some are not, that some are going to have a competitive edge and that some are not, that some are going to be well capitalized and that some are not. Buy indexes and you get a mix of all of them. You won’t do as well as if you put in the effort to separate the sheep from the goats. But you’ll do pretty darn well all the same.
ALSO at DBKP: Stock Investing: Much of Today’s Understanding is Primitive
How well? The U.S. economy has been sufficiently productive to generate an average long-term return for stock investors of 6.5 percent real for 140 years now. That’s what you can expect if you become a follower of the lazy Buffett approach to investing.
Now — I need to make a very, very, very important point. Indexing is the answer for the typical middle-class investor. But John Bogle and the other Buy-and-Holders have given indexing a bad name with the tireless promotion of their misleading marketing slogans.
I advocate a reformed Bogle approach called “Valuation-Informed Indexing.” This approach incorporates the critically important lessons we have learned from the academic research of the past 30 years. It is not an indexing approach that will eventually leave you busted, as Bogle’s will. It is an indexing approach that works in the real world.
To understand why valuations are so important, you need to take a moment and consider why it is that Buffett’s approach works so well. Buffett finds a strong value proposition to invest in and then sticks to the decision long enough for it to pay off. Bogle almost does the same. Bogle advocates sticking with your decisions, he recommends long-term investing just as Buffett does. But Bogle leaves out a critically important step in the process of getting the odds on your side. His strategy includes no feature insuring that you are investing in a strong value proposition.
That can never work. Not in the long term.
So —
What makes for a strong value proposition with indexes?
If you can manage to tune out all the junk that the investing “experts” have been putting in your head for 30 years now, you probably can guess. Buying a share of U.S. productivity is much like buying anything else. You have lots of experience buying stuff. What is the one thing that you are certain always to look at to insure that you do not get ripped off when buying carrots or comic books or sweaters or printers?
Price!
Indexes can be wonderful, just like all the other things you can buy with money in this Consumer Wonderland of ours. But they are obviously not wonderful at any possible price! Buy indexes at a good price and you are the house. Buy indexes at a bad price and you are arguably something even worse than a gambler — you are a sap.
Buy indexes at a poor enough price and it’s not just that the long-term odds are not with you, it’s that the long-term odds are against you. Buy indexes at a poor enough price and it’s pretty much a lock that you are going to get a worse return from stocks than you could get from money markets. Yuck! Not good.
Investing could be so simple. The only thing that complicates it is that The Stock-Selling Industry spends hundreds of millions of dollars in marketing expenses trying to persuade you not to take price into consideration. Why would people who make a living from selling stocks want us all to think that we should put our money into stocks regardless of the price at which they are selling? This is a hard one! I might have to think this one over for a few years and get back to you!
I want to free you from the power of the expert stock salesman. I want to teach you how to invest in indexes effectively. I want to teach you to become the house and not the gambler by learning how to distinguish index fund purchases that represent strong long-term value propositions from index fund purchases that represent poor long-term value propositions. I’ll present you next week with a tool that will tell you in five minutes all that you need to know to know whether stocks are going to pay off for you or not.
by Rob Bennett
images:
* Casino Review Bank
* DBKP file
Rob Bennett recently authored a Google Knol arguing that “The Bull Market Caused the Economic Crisis.” His bio is here.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mondo Frazier. Mondo Frazier said: Be the house, not the gambler. Investing–The New Rules: Get the Odds on Your Side http://fwd4.me/NaO [...]
[...] Investing–The New Rules: Get the Odds on Your Side | DBKP – Death … NBA Playoff Odds: Suns Can Finish Off Spurs in Game 4 – Bodog BeatGordon Brown Resigns, David Miliband Odds On To Succeed HimNBA Playoff Odds: LA Lakers at Utah Jazz – Bodog BeatIs there a difference between a CR 250 and a CR 250R? | bomoWhat does it mean when you miss your period for two whole months …AAER Obtains Extension of Stay Period Under CCAA «greenorbz.comBeer, Cigarettes & Marijuana — What's the difference? – US …Missed period on Seasonique ? | eHealth JunctionFederal College Loan Consolidation – Merge Within the Grace Period …Sometimes I just cannot period myself from let out this special … View the Contact Powered by Mobile [...]
[...] 10, 2010 in Stock Market, Truth2Freedom Headline Alerts http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2010/05/the-new-rules-get-the-odds-on-your-side/ Categories Select Category Christianity and Spirituality Stock Market Truth2Freedom Headline [...]
[...] Investing: The New Rules — You Don’t Want to Be the Gambler, You Want to Be the House Published in May 11th, 2010 Posted by Rob in Investing: The New Rules The Death by 1,000 Papercuts site recently published the second entry in my Investing: The New Rules column. It’s called You Don’t Want to Be the Gambler, You Want to Be the House. [...]
This is the worst finance article I have ever read. Is this blog just slapping together random sentences?
Reply
admin Reply:
May 11th, 2010 at 21:17
Wild Cat,
This is the worst comment I have ever read. Are you just slapping together random words?
Usually readers are more specific in what they disagree with and why. I realize it’s probably effective when you drop one of these on a Britney Spears puff piece, but drive-bys don’t cut it here.
Thanks for taking the time, however, on leaving an instructive comment. It’s just not informative in the way you intended.
Reply
Those seeking to learn how to invest effectively should be asking themselves a question upon learning that it is “controversial” today to let investors know that the price they pay for stocks affects the long-term return obtained.
The question is — Why is it controversial? What is the motive behind Wild Cat’s comment?
Wild Cat is not the only one who wants to keep this important information from you. The Stock-Selling Industry is a multi-million dollar enterprise and lots of web sites and personal finance bloggers are getting a free ride on the multi-million dollar marketing campaigns of The Stock-Selling Industry by repeating the same marketing slogans as if they were proven truths.
I had no idea that this sort of thing was going on when I began studying investing in an in-depth way eight years ago. What I have learned has shocked and stunned and amazed me. There are lots of Wild Cats out there today. I have seen some of the biggest names in the field tolerate the tactics being employed here by Wild Cat.
The conflict between what works well from a marketing perspective and what works well from an investing perspective is the biggest problem in the investing field today. It affects just about everything you read about this subject. Amazing but true!
Rob
Reply
Those who are trying to learn how to invest effectively should be wondering about Wild Cat’s motive in putting forward such words. I have posted at numerous discussion boards and blogs over the past eight years and we have seen abusive posting at just about all of them.
That’s a strange reality, is it not? Investing is about numbers, stuff that everyone should be able to agree on and that shouldn’t generate much controversy, no? And everyone benefits from getting the numbers right and thereby learning how to invest more effectively, no?
No.
Investing is something done by humans. And investing advice is given by humans. Where you have humans, you have egos. The way it is.
There was a time when most believed that Buy-and-Hold was a winner. So lots of people put their reputations and egos behind the promotion of Buy-and-Hold. Now the bottom has fallen out of this idea that there is no need to lower your stock allocation when prices go to insanely dangerous levels. We are living in a transition time in which we are moving from having Buy-and-Hold as the dominant model to having Valuation-Informed Indexing as the dominant model. There is going to be some turbulence as the Big Egos adjust to The New Realities.
My advice for the middle-class investors who don’t care to get involved in the Ego Wars is to keep your eyes on the prize. Buy-and-Hold teaches that there is no need to change your stock allocation when prices go to insanely dangerous levels. Does that make sense to you? If not, you need to open yourself to some new ideas.
The purpose of this column is to explore those new ideas. I have learned a lot from Buy-and-Holders and will certainly often be praising them to the sky for having taught us so many important and true things. But I will also be bringing the Buy-and-Holders to task when they teach nonsense that they should recognize as nonsense. Those who follow the literature in this field have known for 30 years now that valuations affect long-term returns. That’s a stone cold verifiable fact.
It gets some Buy-and-Holders very angry when I point out that fact. I don’t do it to make these people angry. I do it because I cannot offer effective advice without letting my readers know of this critically important reality. So I am going to continue doing it. I love and respect many Buy-and-Holders; I want to be friends with them. But when they make it clear that the price of obtaining their friendship is selling out my readers, I am compelled to politely decline the offer.
That has been my practice for eight years now. My intent is to continue on the path I have walked for those eight years. My strong hunch is that Wild Cat could offer more constructive and more positive and more life-affirming comments if he came to see the value in us all enjoying a Learning Together experience. I hope that he comes around in time. If he is truly incapable of coming around, my second-choice hope is that he finds more productive things to do with his time than to try to disrupt the Learning Together experience that we are trying to build at this site.
Rob
Reply
[...] it is with stocks. We explored last week why index funds represent the best choice for the typical middle-class investor. When you buy an index fund, you are buying a share of the [...]
[...] argued in an earlier column that you don’t want to be the gambler in a casino, you want to be the house. Say that a gambler pulls a slot machine lever only 10 times. Is it a certainty that the house will [...]
[...] Weather Report * Investing–The New Rules: Harness the Power of The Stock Return Predictor * Investing–The New Rules: Get the Odds on Your Side * Stock Investing: Much of Today’s Understanding is [...]
[...] Weather Report * Investing–The New Rules: Harness the Power of The Stock Return Predictor * Investing–The New Rules: Get the Odds on Your Side * Stock Investing: Much of Today’s Understanding is Primitive Those are the first three [...]
[...] Weather Report * Investing–The New Rules: Harness the Power of The Stock Return Predictor * Investing–The New Rules: Get the Odds on Your Side * Stock Investing: Much of Today’s Understanding is Primitive Buy-and-Hold investing [...]