<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Van Jones Resignation Will Backfire Against the GOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/09/van-jones-resignation-will-backfire-against-the-gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/09/van-jones-resignation-will-backfire-against-the-gop/</link>
	<description>The WORLDWIDE LEADER in WEIRD ~~~ News -Politics -Commentary -Weird News -Crime -Opinion -Entertainment -Scandals -Celebrities -Conspiracies -Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 03:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rides A Pale Horse</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/09/van-jones-resignation-will-backfire-against-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-10994</link>
		<dc:creator>Rides A Pale Horse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=6176#comment-10994</guid>
		<description>When there is a &quot;backlash&quot;, and I&#039;m sure there will be, as the administrations&#039; willing accomplices in the press will say so and as per usual, will show or manufacture ANY excuse or &quot;reason&quot; to vilify those who would hold the administration to account for their actions or lack thereof.

The question of &quot;vetting&quot; candidates for the unelected, unaccountable &quot;czars&quot; positions will be ignored however, since there are several questions that, at least in the case of Van Jones, were apparently ignored or possibly viewed as &lt;em&gt;advantageous&lt;/em&gt; to the administrations agenda, in its own questionnaire/application for prospective positions (See questions #45 and  #46)  http://www.isra-pvf.com/obamaquestionnaire.pdf  .

Although we don&#039;t know whether there were any &quot;diaries&quot; kept, (question #14), information regarding Jones&#039; past would certainly fall under the &quot;.....contains anything that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrasssment to you, your family, or the President Elect if it were made public....&quot;

Of course, if one were to answer no to question #59, that would probably fast track one to the position applied for, disregarding any other negative information contained in the application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When there is a &#8220;backlash&#8221;, and I&#8217;m sure there will be, as the administrations&#8217; willing accomplices in the press will say so and as per usual, will show or manufacture ANY excuse or &#8220;reason&#8221; to vilify those who would hold the administration to account for their actions or lack thereof.</p>
<p>The question of &#8220;vetting&#8221; candidates for the unelected, unaccountable &#8220;czars&#8221; positions will be ignored however, since there are several questions that, at least in the case of Van Jones, were apparently ignored or possibly viewed as <em>advantageous</em> to the administrations agenda, in its own questionnaire/application for prospective positions (See questions #45 and  #46)  <a href="http://www.isra-pvf.com/obamaquestionnaire.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.isra-pvf.com/obamaquestionnaire.pdf</a>  .</p>
<p>Although we don&#8217;t know whether there were any &#8220;diaries&#8221; kept, (question #14), information regarding Jones&#8217; past would certainly fall under the &#8220;&#8230;..contains anything that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrasssment to you, your family, or the President Elect if it were made public&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, if one were to answer no to question #59, that would probably fast track one to the position applied for, disregarding any other negative information contained in the application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

