Comments on: Global Warming: Two New Scientific Assertions Counteract Fossil Fuels Consensus

By: Hard Right

Hard Right — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:14:35 +0000

Ok. Problem with the Lu story. Did some searching and found this on the first page on Google.

“…Lu agrees that CFCs are responsible for destroying the ozone layer but argues it’s not reactions induced by ultraviolet light that deplete the ozone but CFCs’ reaction with electrons in the atmosphere…”

That’s from a CBC link. And before you think I’m some AGW nut, I am a strong skeptic. It’s just that this seems contradictory to what you posted.

By: Flan Man(the man with the plaster plan)

Flan Man(the man with the plaster plan) — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:29:40 +0000

Ahoy,

The toilet snorkel was a serious shocker!! I could barely keep my suprise contained. Thanks for the good read.

By: PA Pundits - International

PA Pundits - International — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:04:32 +0000

Global Warming: Two New Scientific Assertions Counteract Fossil Fuels Consensus…

By Pat at DBKP.
Global Warming: Two Startling Assertions
Within days of each other, two startling assertions regarding Earth’s atmosphere have been made. Seemingly unrelated, in fact they both question scientific consensus, a panicking public, e…

By: tarunkjuyal

tarunkjuyal — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:03:51 +0000

nice article. I'm regular reader of you blog. I also started by blog on fossils fuels.