<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/</link>
	<description>The Worldwide Leader in Weird ~ News - Politics - Weird News - Crime - Scandals - Celebrities - Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:53:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuckkel</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-14411</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-14411</guid>
		<description>82% of the surface weather stations in the USA have been surveyed since 2007 and have found that 61% have temperature errors in the 2-5 degrees Celsius range plus an additional 8% have error rates greater than 5 degrees Celsius.  

Most of the bias is towards warming due to the weather stations being placed near/over asphalt surfaces, near structures that block air movement, etc.

http://www.surfacestations.org for the entire site

My favorite photo showing the Webber Grill five feet beneath the weather station.  This site really shows global warming every Friday during the lunchtime barbecue.  http://www.surfacestations.org/images/Hopkinsville_current.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>82% of the surface weather stations in the USA have been surveyed since 2007 and have found that 61% have temperature errors in the 2-5 degrees Celsius range plus an additional 8% have error rates greater than 5 degrees Celsius.  </p>
<p>Most of the bias is towards warming due to the weather stations being placed near/over asphalt surfaces, near structures that block air movement, etc.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.surfacestations.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfacestations.org</a> for the entire site</p>
<p>My favorite photo showing the Webber Grill five feet beneath the weather station.  This site really shows global warming every Friday during the lunchtime barbecue.  <a href="http://www.surfacestations.org/images/Hopkinsville_current.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfacestations.org/images/Hopkinsville_current.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckkel</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-14410</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-14410</guid>
		<description>Most data from the CRU and NASA, and if they were purposely biased that data towards warming, then other researchers will see warming.  Garbage in yields garbage out, even with your supercomputer.  That&#039;s why the climate models, when applied to past known weather, do not forecast what really took place.    Hiding data and making it unavailable to review, points directly to fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most data from the CRU and NASA, and if they were purposely biased that data towards warming, then other researchers will see warming.  Garbage in yields garbage out, even with your supercomputer.  That&#8217;s why the climate models, when applied to past known weather, do not forecast what really took place.    Hiding data and making it unavailable to review, points directly to fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UFOs, Obama Afghan Indecision: Do UFOs Explain Obama&#8217;s Dithering? &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-13032</link>
		<dc:creator>UFOs, Obama Afghan Indecision: Do UFOs Explain Obama&#8217;s Dithering? &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-13032</guid>
		<description>[...] James Hansen is well-known for cooking the books on man made climate change data [James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change]. Might the space agency be doing some other book [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Hansen is well-known for cooking the books on man made climate change data [James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change]. Might the space agency be doing some other book [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ocean temps reach new highs - Page 2 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-10872</link>
		<dc:creator>Ocean temps reach new highs - Page 2 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-10872</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by M-Roadster Fan   Yeah, riiiiigggggghhhht...     James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP      __________________ Tempest     &#160;function fbs_click() [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by M-Roadster Fan   Yeah, riiiiigggggghhhht&#8230;     James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change | DBKP &#8211; Death By 1000 Papercuts &#8211; DBKP      __________________ Tempest     &nbsp;function fbs_click() [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 2009 International Conference on Climate Change: Al Gore will be under his bed sucking his thumb! &#171; Stop Socialism Now</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-9174</link>
		<dc:creator>The 2009 International Conference on Climate Change: Al Gore will be under his bed sucking his thumb! &#171; Stop Socialism Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-9174</guid>
		<description>[...] James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)NASA Debunks Part of Global Warming Myth, Will Media Report It?Still denying global warming?A Really Inconvenient TruthGPS: Global warming debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)NASA Debunks Part of Global Warming Myth, Will Media Report It?Still denying global warming?A Really Inconvenient TruthGPS: Global warming debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global warming over. - Page 4</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-8647</link>
		<dc:creator>Global warming over. - Page 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-8647</guid>
		<description>[...] umm, *inaccurate*. NASA had to release amended figures which puts the hottest year as 1934 .... See James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP for details and links to the amended data (only chose this link &#039;cos it was first when I googled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] umm, *inaccurate*. NASA had to release amended figures which puts the hottest year as 1934 &#8230;. See James Hansen: Cooking the NASA Books for Climate Change | DBKP &#8211; Death By 1000 Papercuts &#8211; DBKP for details and links to the amended data (only chose this link &#8216;cos it was first when I googled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-7893</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-7893</guid>
		<description>Here’s what NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) actually said:

“The global land surface temperature was 50.72 degrees F — 2.02 degrees F above the 20th century mean of 48.7 degrees F, ranking as the warmest October on record.  The combined global land and ocean surface temperature for January-October was 58.25 degrees F – 0.85 degree above the 20th century mean of 57.4 degrees F and ranking as the 9th warmest January-October on record.”
- www.noaanews.noaa.gov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s what NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) actually said:</p>
<p>“The global land surface temperature was 50.72 degrees F — 2.02 degrees F above the 20th century mean of 48.7 degrees F, ranking as the warmest October on record.  The combined global land and ocean surface temperature for January-October was 58.25 degrees F – 0.85 degree above the 20th century mean of 57.4 degrees F and ranking as the 9th warmest January-October on record.”<br />
- <a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-7599</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-7599</guid>
		<description>Troll, nonsense. The temperature high since 1979, the year that satellite temperature commenced, is 1998. Thereafter there was a plateau of ambiguous extent. In 2002  temperatures around the world commenced to decline. In February of 2006 this downward trend actually became statistically significant.  Get outside once in a while.  Lastly , the  biologic health of the world would improve this a rise of a degree or 2. Rain fall would increase, severe storms would decrease, bio fauna would dramatically increase as it did between 1995 and 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troll, nonsense. The temperature high since 1979, the year that satellite temperature commenced, is 1998. Thereafter there was a plateau of ambiguous extent. In 2002  temperatures around the world commenced to decline. In February of 2006 this downward trend actually became statistically significant.  Get outside once in a while.  Lastly , the  biologic health of the world would improve this a rise of a degree or 2. Rain fall would increase, severe storms would decrease, bio fauna would dramatically increase as it did between 1995 and 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: troll</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-7596</link>
		<dc:creator>troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-7596</guid>
		<description>So I just finished reading the NOAA pages on how the data was interpreted, and adjusted for changes in how temperatures were collected.  You mock this one scientist for &#039;fudging&#039; the data.  Yes, his data needs to be inspected.  That is what peer review is all about.  Seems he screwed up royally -- but it doesn&#039;t discount the research from thousands of other scientists worldwide -- or the NOAA (not NASA) data.  THAT data shows the warming trend.  Not cooling.  Warming.

You should do yourself a favor and read the data, and the techniques.  Avoid Hansen if you want to.  There&#039;s nothing wrong with pointing out his shilling is just as unproductive as the head-in-the-sand neo cons.  But -- don&#039;t lie to us because you like to mock people.  You&#039;re no better than Hansen in spitting useless tripe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I just finished reading the NOAA pages on how the data was interpreted, and adjusted for changes in how temperatures were collected.  You mock this one scientist for &#8216;fudging&#8217; the data.  Yes, his data needs to be inspected.  That is what peer review is all about.  Seems he screwed up royally &#8212; but it doesn&#8217;t discount the research from thousands of other scientists worldwide &#8212; or the NOAA (not NASA) data.  THAT data shows the warming trend.  Not cooling.  Warming.</p>
<p>You should do yourself a favor and read the data, and the techniques.  Avoid Hansen if you want to.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with pointing out his shilling is just as unproductive as the head-in-the-sand neo cons.  But &#8212; don&#8217;t lie to us because you like to mock people.  You&#8217;re no better than Hansen in spitting useless tripe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gore and the Global Warming Fraud Exposed : EarthFrisk Blog</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/james-hansen-cooking-the-nasa-books-for-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-7556</link>
		<dc:creator>Gore and the Global Warming Fraud Exposed : EarthFrisk Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=4742#comment-7556</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems that the global warming &#8220;prophet&#8221; James Hansen and his friends at NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies have been fudging some of the global warming numbers. It was Hansen and Company who told us that this past October was the warmest October on record. link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems that the global warming &#8220;prophet&#8221; James Hansen and his friends at NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies have been fudging some of the global warming numbers. It was Hansen and Company who told us that this past October was the warmest October on record. link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
