Comments on: British Environmentally Safe Bathing: Sex, Soap and Save the Earth

By: Karagush

Karagush — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:42:30 +0000

Ok. Look I am a complete hedonist. hard to get more libertine than me. My partner is a marine. Hes also well deeply uninhibited. NEITHER of us would find this acceptable materiel for our child to come home from school with, as a promotion for “environmentally responsible hygiene.” That is BS. Quick shower by yourself is environmentally responsible. wet down with a hose even. ok. Long sexy baths with a friend should not be promoted until that kid hits the college dorm.

Besides we were thinkin that stuff up for ourselves when we were 16 or so.

why get em started at 8?

By: pat

pat — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:35:59 +0000

Heidi, we strongly suggest you take a year of yoga prior to tackling some of these positions. And do not expect to save on water or money.

Jack, I object to the pediophilic distribution, this book was targeted for and given to young children. This is simply creepy.

By: Heidi

Heidi — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:55:58 +0000

I’m a hedonist environmental liberal and I love your articles! Knowledge from all sources is the only way you can make a decision on an issue. Occasionally I agree with your view point.

Do you know where I can get a copy of that handout? I want to make a sticker from the co-ed tub illustrations. I don’t mind a wet floor and a few dirty towels!

By: Jack Sanderson

Jack Sanderson — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:54:23 +0000

Keep in mind that we Republcan single males, including almost all the single servicemembers doing the fighting, are of a younger generation that does not think like the dying generation of old people that missed the sexual revolution and decried it (mostly out of sour grapes because they were too old to enjoy it).

It may not happen before 2010, but the clash is going to get very open and rude if goody-two-shoes types try to retain control of the Republican party.

The only direction to go is toward libertarianism: small government means NO regulation of people’s lives including NO attempts at social reengineering. You can decry the above book as an attempt to socially reengineer but you must not write your own books to try to engineer things back in the direction your particular religion suggests.

One really has to remember the difference between decrying the gay agenda and promoting one’s own agenda.

By: Jack Sanderson

Jack Sanderson — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:46:13 +0000

You lost me on your conclusion. While I agree that environmentalists tend to also be OK with premarital sex between heterosexuals, and while I agree that this book was inappropriate for children, there is nothing hedonistic about promoting premarital sex between heterosexuals in general.

Isn’t this site supposed to be libertarian?

Because, if the 2008 election showed anything it is that “Social Conservatism” really is dead, dead, dead.

We Republican single males will never again tolerate a platform of “Family Values,” a supposed need for federally funded “adult abstinence training” and references to the need to fight “Sex Trafficking” (feminist cause encompasses all voluntary prostitution and seeks to regulate men who try to date women over the Internet).

If you want to see more Republicans voted out of office in 2010, continue to pretend that there is still a market for social conservativism.

If you want to fight the gay agenda, you must now only do so by saying that the heterosexual agenda.is OK.

We are on to you now.

For too long we thought your only problem was the leftist gay agenda. If only you were that focussed.

By: LBG1

LBG1 — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:40:55 +0000

You’re right!

That is so much bullshit! And worse.

Great article.