British Environmentally Safe Bathing: Sex, Soap and Save the Earth
If you're new to DBKP, you may want to subscribe to the DBKP.com RSS feed. Thanks for stopping by!
Proper British Bathing Instructions
For the Environmentally-Aware Child
The Brits have come up with a new way to impress 8-year-olds with environmental awareness.
An illustrated book entitled “How To Change The World For A Fiver”, was distributed to children on excursion by department store, Sainsbury. A father heard his daughter and friends giggling while reading the book and discovered the section on coed bathing.
Apparently the British enviros have dispensed with their former bathing instructions. You know, the short shower wet down.
Off water.
Soap.
Finally, the speed rinse. (All too familiar to mariners, by the way). Now tubs are back in–along with frolicking and oral sex.
Being a contortionists apparently helps save water also.
The book has other helpful suggestions. Like kids can shave their genitalia and talk about these things with strangers.
Now I know exactly what the astute DBKP readers are thinking: “That is so much bullshit”.
That is because the sensible readers of DBKP do not live in the make-believe world.
We know that coed bathing does not save water. In fact, it uses a lot more water.
Forty minutes in the tub requires a bit of refresher water. The splashing horseplay gets water all over the floor.
Then, there is the post-bath shower. The tub washing and the bathroom cleanup to hide the evidence of the environmentally-worthy bath.
Been there, done that.
[ABOVE: The aftermath]
So, why this advice in a book primarily about saving the world?
Because to a large extent, the environmental movement is about no such thing. It is about forcing an overall philosophy of liberalism upon society.
Modern environmentalist are inevitably Global Warmists. They are against Western civilization and mores. They are in favor of abortion on demand, the gay agenda, and any such sociological causes. Environmentalism at this level is merely one component of an over-arching, sectarian belief in hedonism–mixed with a need for domination and punishment for those who disagree.
It is contrary and delusional.
But, so is all liberal thought today.
by pat
Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1085069/Try-new-today—blundering-Sainsburys-gives-booklet-sex-positions-year-olds.html
More from this category
- Arab Man’s Dream of Becoming Executioner Comes True
- John Travolta’s Son’s Death Sparks Furious Debate over Scientology
- John Travolta’s Tragic Loss of Son and Scientology Speculation
- Terror in Surburia: Campaigns Waged Against Neighborhoods By Antisocial Kids
More from this author
- France’s Muslim Youth Celebrate New Year’s Eve Torching 1100 Cars while Sarkozy Vows to Get Tough
- Heavy Equipment Operator Video: How to Strip a Girl in less than 4 Minutes
- UK Prisoners Suffer Stigma of Having to Wear Orange
- Mumbai Terrorist Attack: Sexual Torture Of Victims Confirmed
Subscribe to this author
↑ Grab this Headline Animator for your webpage OR
Click the banner to grab DBKP's News Feed for Yourself!
You’re right!
That is so much bullshit! And worse.
Great article.
[Reply]
You lost me on your conclusion. While I agree that environmentalists tend to also be OK with premarital sex between heterosexuals, and while I agree that this book was inappropriate for children, there is nothing hedonistic about promoting premarital sex between heterosexuals in general.
Isn’t this site supposed to be libertarian?
Because, if the 2008 election showed anything it is that “Social Conservatism” really is dead, dead, dead.
We Republican single males will never again tolerate a platform of “Family Values,” a supposed need for federally funded “adult abstinence training” and references to the need to fight “Sex Trafficking” (feminist cause encompasses all voluntary prostitution and seeks to regulate men who try to date women over the Internet).
If you want to see more Republicans voted out of office in 2010, continue to pretend that there is still a market for social conservativism.
If you want to fight the gay agenda, you must now only do so by saying that the heterosexual agenda.is OK.
We are on to you now.
For too long we thought your only problem was the leftist gay agenda. If only you were that focussed.
[Reply]
Keep in mind that we Republcan single males, including almost all the single servicemembers doing the fighting, are of a younger generation that does not think like the dying generation of old people that missed the sexual revolution and decried it (mostly out of sour grapes because they were too old to enjoy it).
It may not happen before 2010, but the clash is going to get very open and rude if goody-two-shoes types try to retain control of the Republican party.
The only direction to go is toward libertarianism: small government means NO regulation of people’s lives including NO attempts at social reengineering. You can decry the above book as an attempt to socially reengineer but you must not write your own books to try to engineer things back in the direction your particular religion suggests.
One really has to remember the difference between decrying the gay agenda and promoting one’s own agenda.
[Reply]
I’m a hedonist environmental liberal and I love your articles! Knowledge from all sources is the only way you can make a decision on an issue. Occasionally I agree with your view point.
Do you know where I can get a copy of that handout? I want to make a sticker from the co-ed tub illustrations. I don’t mind a wet floor and a few dirty towels!
[Reply]
Heidi, we strongly suggest you take a year of yoga prior to tackling some of these positions. And do not expect to save on water or money.
Jack, I object to the pediophilic distribution, this book was targeted for and given to young children. This is simply creepy.
[Reply]
Ok. Look I am a complete hedonist. hard to get more libertine than me. My partner is a marine. Hes also well deeply uninhibited. NEITHER of us would find this acceptable materiel for our child to come home from school with, as a promotion for “environmentally responsible hygiene.” That is BS. Quick shower by yourself is environmentally responsible. wet down with a hose even. ok. Long sexy baths with a friend should not be promoted until that kid hits the college dorm.
Besides we were thinkin that stuff up for ourselves when we were 16 or so.
why get em started at 8?
[Reply]