Young women voted overwhelmingly for Obama and older PUMAs now know they need to accomodate the wishes of the younger women. That means no Hillary, Hillary has no chance now, ever.

As you know from being a SUPPOSED Republican, Dave, we conservatives and independents never had a problem with a woman being president as long as it was not THAT woman.

You disgraced yourself begging Hillary people for help the other day. You looked like Charlie Brown thinking that Lucy was going to hold the football properly this time. If a conservative candidate needed Hillary’s help, he or she would have to be terribly weak because the US is a conservative country.

And, yes, because Sarah Palin, despite having one our initial respect because of her libertarian utterances in the past, she allowed herself to be endorsed by a NOW feminist leader and just aped George Bush and McCain insanities about maybe needing to go to war with Russia; so many conservatives don’t want THAT woman anywhere near the White House either.

Angela Merkel of Germany, on the other hand, is just great and conservative American males would love to have someone like that run the USA.

Karen Sibelius and Claire McSomething (Missouri) would also make good Democrat presidential material MAYBE in the future after Obama blows it or not.

Don’t ever betray your fellow conservatives like that again Dave. You ignored me the other day to beg powerless PUMAs to join you. On a macro level, people like you were insulting tens of millions of people like me in acting like that. We looked at the castrated males who pandered to the Hillary crowd and just didn’t bother going to the polls.

Why would we want to vote on the same side as you if we don’t even like each other?

In essence, 10 Million conservative males did not vote at all because guys like you wanted Hillary feminists on their side.

And don’t say “I just like these Hillary feminists more than you”…because you may as well join the Democrats if that is your attitude about your fellow American males.

You are aware that most US troops despise Hillary Clinton and victim feminism, right?

I did not vote for Obama today…..I voted for McCain / Palin.

I think Hillary was treated horribly by Obama, his backers, and the majority of the media and pundants. Sarah Palin has suffered the same biased and sexist comments while running for Vice President. When Hillary was running we all heard alot about …..” We ‘re not sexist…we’d vote for a woman …just not THAT woman!” What a crock of shit! Hillary is far more qualified than Obama and even that turn coat weezle Biden said the same damn thing while he was running against Obama! Biden said that Obama was not qualified! Makes me sick how this election has been so biased and set up for an Obama win….It’s horrible!

When McCain chose Sarah Palin we all got to see first hand that the sexism and bias was not just against ( Hillary Clinton)THAT woman but ANY woman that dares to reach for higher office! This is so very disturbing to so many women all over this country and the world. Once again women have been passed off as “second-class citizens” and made to feel like we are not equals. Why women are willing to stand for this amazes me. Fair pay and equal opportunity for women in business,industry,and politics will never never truly change unless we put a women in the White House as either President or Vice President. That is sad and unfortunate but very true.

I fear that this election has been rigged for an Obama win from the get-go with ACORN sealing the deal and Black Panthers intimedating white voters at polling points it seems even more rigged today. I am astounded that so many people are willing to vote for Obama with no experience , radical friends and views, no executive experience at balancing a budget when our economy is in such turmoil, and with no regaurd to the devestating effects and job losses that will come when he,pelosi,and Reid raise our taxes if he is elected! God help us all because we are all going to need it if Obama wins! It will be devistating to anyone who has worked for a living and it will be a free ride for all those that live on welfare checks for sitting at home playing video games while the rest of us work our asses off to get ahead…..for what? For Obama to take our hard earned cash to give it to those sitting on their asses drawing welfare checks! This is totally disturbing to me and so many others who have always worked hard to get ahead. Today will indeed be a sad day if Obama is elected.

Get out and vote McCain / Palin…At least be willing to stand up for your right to vote because you may not have that right if Obama is elected.

http://logisticsmonster.com/2008/11/04/puma-politics-the-obamanation-is-at-it-again/

Is your organization big enough in numbers to change this election to the McCain/Palin ticket? What’s you take on this.
Give me some more hope.
Thanks,
Dave

Stand Up People – no more Republican, Democrat, or Indie – just Americans.

Has anyone told Nancy yet that I’m coming for her, Frank and Dodd?

GOD BLESS YOU ALL.
DAVE, A HUMBLE AND HOPEFULL REPUBLICAN

1) There needs to be a Constitutional Amendment that, by changing one or two words in the Constitution, will change us to a parliamentary democracy where PUMAs can have 20% of Congress and not worry about being “weak and out of power” because, as long as PUMAs are reasonable, they would be likely to find coalition partners to be able to govern or help govern.

Every country the US liberated adopted the above system rather than the naive American system that was built on the childishly short-sighted idea that the US colonies would always split along REGIONAL differences (Rhode Islanders monolithicly thought differently than South Carolininians 200 years ago) rather than along, for instance, feminist/libertarian/religious freak/neocon faultlines.

That way, Libertarians can have 20% of Congress as well…and we could theoretically end up part of an administration some day. This is unlikely, by the way, because European democracies always end up with feminists and libertarians being the last factions that would ever ally with each other for any reason.

But at least we would all have our say. Right now, PUMAs and Libertarians are SHUT OUT by the dishonest US media.

I think we can get such an amendment passed because it is only in the past 10 years that Americans stopped voting primarily along regional lines.

2) Congress needs to stop licensing TV Frequencies to ABCNBCCBSFOX and let the rest of us share broadcasting over those frequencies. The PUMAs can have Wednesdays and the Libertarians can have Thursdays for instance.

Or Congress can say “This year, Channel 7 in New York City will be run by Ms. Jane Doe of 465 Third Avenue” who won the lottery for broadcast rights.” I wouldn’t care if Jane Doe is a feminist because she would be replaced the next year by lottery.

I am serious. It is corruption to allow the same people to license TV frequencies year after year like that.

Especially when 76% of Americans say they are full of it.

The excuse given is that the FCC gives the licenses to those who pay the most which is good for the US Treasury.

But we can change the criterion to one of “Sharing the Airwaves” because TV frequencies should be seen like parkland or beachfronts. There is nothing Marxist about demanding equal time for PUBLICLY OWNED airwaves.

Luckily, YouTube and other forms of Internet broadcasting have been helping in that regard…but remember that YouTube personnel can remove anything they want. Wikipedia personnel are not much better or they are worse.

It is IRONIC however to see Hillary supporters complaining about a violation of free speech.

If someone tried to regulate PUMA websites you would get violent, but, according to Hillary and the NOW, it is OK to regulate men by background checking them before communicating via websites.

Apparently, PUMAs DESERVE to have their voices heard but the Men’s Rights Movement does not. Otherwise the Clintonites would have allowed males to at least kNOW ABOUT IT when Clinton and Cantwell had all their Senate Hearings about certain feminist issues in the past 8 years.

Hillary’s downfall in 2008 was just a matter of her getting a taste of her own medicine (although I agree that two wrongs do not make a right).

I think it is totally appropriate to compare the PUMA fury over losing their right to be heard in the media with the Men’s Rights fury over their right to be heard in the media — something that Clintonites actively strive to stop.

I mean some of you are doing this now. You are pretending that anyone’s beef with radical feminist lawmaking is just about “dating preferences”.

That is called “conflating” and it is what the Obama people did to you all the time on various subjects.

For instance, you tried to point out that Obama was inexperienced.

They responded by saying “You don’t like him because he is black and from the wrong side of town”.

He was still inexperienced…but they had already pigeon-holed where you were coming from.

They had made your entire point of view politically incorrect, trivial, banal, boorish and not worthy of further discussion.

So you can do the same thing to me and pretend that I am just some nut who shouldn’t care so much about laws against dating women.

That way you can avoid the real issues I have brought up regarding Hillary’s love of Internet regulation and the love for Nanny State “protection” for women.

Regarding the need to stop Hillary’s desire to reglate the Internet and her attack on the Right to Assemble…that really cannot be belittled as just a discussion over “dating preferences”. But even then…someone who wants to actively promote Gay Marriage would be a hypocrit to pretend that Heterosexual Males are “on another planet” if they complain about the Marxist feminist desire to regulate whom they can say hello to and how they can communicate.

Would you care to regulate Gay.com? Would you be telling gays that they are “on another planet” if they thought it was a big deal that your candidate wants to take their rights away?

If you think PUMAs are being ignored, check out how much representation Heterosexual Males are getting. Do you see any candidate actively targeting Heterosexual Males as a constituency?

Going after “NASCAR Dads” or “Joe the Plumber” or assuming that hetero males are the husbands of “Security Moms”…that does not, by a long shot, imply you will care about their rights as heterosexuals.

For instance, NASCAR Dad implies that we should already be someone’s husband before voting.

NASCAR Dad also implies that we are not businessmen who travel the world, but just Joe Schmuck whose primary interest is whether the red car beats the blue car going around in circles on a little track. Welcome to 1984.

What ARE you talking about? What universe do you come from?

What do your dating preferences and a “take-over” of the Republican Party have to do with this site and this election? I am at a loss for words, although that doesn’t often happen.

For your edification, PUMAs are united by three goals: (1.) to defeat Obama on November 4th and (2.) to re-claim the Democratic Party for its voters and (3.) to reform the leadership and practices of the DNC.

Although I cannot speak for all PUMAs, I am not or will not ever be a Republican, even though I will vote for them this year. If Obama wins, I will re-register as an Independent. This election fiasco has opened my eyes to the real role that “the party” plays in voter suppression, intimation, and nullification. So, Jack, maybe you can now understand the acronym…Party Unity My Ass.PUMAs are really all about….people….not parties. I think the “parties” can kiss our a**es until they get a brain and a conscience.