<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards Scandal: The Many Faces of Contrition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/</link>
	<description>The Worldwide Leader in Weird ~ News - Politics - Weird News - Crime - Scandals - Celebrities - Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:28:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Edwards Scandal: Grand Jury Decision Awaits Edwards &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-10839</link>
		<dc:creator>John Edwards Scandal: Grand Jury Decision Awaits Edwards &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-10839</guid>
		<description>[...] What, Me Lie? Edwards&#8217; August 8 2008 national mea culpa on ABC Nightline [John Edwards Scandal: The Many Faces of Contrition] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What, Me Lie? Edwards&#8217; August 8 2008 national mea culpa on ABC Nightline [John Edwards Scandal: The Many Faces of Contrition] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winter, Global Warming Pictures: Man-Made Climate Change Comes Early &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-7503</link>
		<dc:creator>Winter, Global Warming Pictures: Man-Made Climate Change Comes Early &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-7503</guid>
		<description>[...] Convention * 52: August 12, 2008 Beijing Olympics: China’s Language Barrier * 51: August 8, 2008 John Edwards Scandal: The Many Faces of Contrition * 50: July 22, 2008 Candy Cigarettes: The Most Politically-Incorrect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Convention * 52: August 12, 2008 Beijing Olympics: China’s Language Barrier * 51: August 8, 2008 John Edwards Scandal: The Many Faces of Contrition * 50: July 22, 2008 Candy Cigarettes: The Most Politically-Incorrect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Vice</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Vice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Gitmo which is horrendously old news will likely get more news coverage over the next two years than the Edwards story will, because leftists would rather attack their own country over and over and over and over than make a single one of their own accountable for anything. 

Liberals will be in downplay mode, eager to get back to trashing their own country - saying:

“Poor Edwards’ family.  They must really be hurting right now.  Now let’s get back to talking about how horrible America is...and how Conservatives are to blame – never minding the fact that liberals have been in control of congress for how long?.”

That is the difference….

When a conservative messes up, other conservatives pressure the idiot out of whatever office they hold or hope to hold.  Conservatives don’t start making excuses, yipping again about 6 year old stories designed to announce to the world how much they hate their country.

When a liberal lies, cheats, pays off a mistress and insults others in the process – well then liberals immediately go into all the reasons why it’s no big deal.

Well here’s a news flash for the wild eyed, protest giddy leftist who seems to think this isn’t a big deal…..  this story is not going away in a week.. or two… or three….Why?

Because Edwards is STILL lying about half the story…  He lies even when he “supposedly” is coming clean.  Of course Clinton really said it best – it all depends on what the definition of “is” is……   

Danny Vice
http://www.theweeklyvice.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gitmo which is horrendously old news will likely get more news coverage over the next two years than the Edwards story will, because leftists would rather attack their own country over and over and over and over than make a single one of their own accountable for anything. </p>
<p>Liberals will be in downplay mode, eager to get back to trashing their own country &#8211; saying:</p>
<p>“Poor Edwards’ family.  They must really be hurting right now.  Now let’s get back to talking about how horrible America is&#8230;and how Conservatives are to blame – never minding the fact that liberals have been in control of congress for how long?.”</p>
<p>That is the difference….</p>
<p>When a conservative messes up, other conservatives pressure the idiot out of whatever office they hold or hope to hold.  Conservatives don’t start making excuses, yipping again about 6 year old stories designed to announce to the world how much they hate their country.</p>
<p>When a liberal lies, cheats, pays off a mistress and insults others in the process – well then liberals immediately go into all the reasons why it’s no big deal.</p>
<p>Well here’s a news flash for the wild eyed, protest giddy leftist who seems to think this isn’t a big deal…..  this story is not going away in a week.. or two… or three….Why?</p>
<p>Because Edwards is STILL lying about half the story…  He lies even when he “supposedly” is coming clean.  Of course Clinton really said it best – it all depends on what the definition of “is” is……   </p>
<p>Danny Vice<br />
<a href="http://www.theweeklyvice.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.theweeklyvice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIke</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>MIke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>Why let John Edwards define himself as a narcissist?  How is he different from any other cheating husband? Seems to me that he&#039;s just a grade A (and stupid) Adulterer.

If John Edwards is a narcissist, then lets compare this to the DSM psychiatric criteria for his personality disorder:
 
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV-R), the diagnostic classification system used in the United States, as &quot;a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and a lack of empathy.&quot;

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following[1]:

   1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance  (John Edward wants to be president) 
   2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love  (Admits self-love and seems to loving to preen)
   3. believes that he or she is &quot;special&quot; and unique  (obviously)
   4. requires excessive admiration (obviously)
   5. has a sense of entitlement  (ran again after losing with Kerry, believes he DESERVES to be VP)
   6. is interpersonally exploitative (used his wife&#039;s cancer and love to gain sympathy while destroying her love with adultery)
   7. lacks empathy (doesn&#039;t care that he has forever defined his children&#039;s lives  with his adultery)
   8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her (everybody want to be me!)
   9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes (claimed he was 99% honest if  Enquirer was 99% wrong!)

So, let John Edwards call himself a narcissist.  Obviously, someone has told him this in the past. So, if you voted for Edwards, then you have to ask yourself why you would put the United States in the hands of such a person?  

Of course, if John Edwards was smart, he&#039;d have claimed that Rielle was simply a surrogate holding his baby (from artificial insemination).  Elizabeth had full knowledge and expected the child to be turned over, but John was meeting with Rielle after she reconsidered. This explanation even covers the money payments.  Well, seems like John really ain&#039;t too bright!!  Just a poor liar and a cheat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why let John Edwards define himself as a narcissist?  How is he different from any other cheating husband? Seems to me that he&#8217;s just a grade A (and stupid) Adulterer.</p>
<p>If John Edwards is a narcissist, then lets compare this to the DSM psychiatric criteria for his personality disorder:</p>
<p>Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV-R), the diagnostic classification system used in the United States, as &#8220;a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and a lack of empathy.&#8221;</p>
<p>A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following[1]:</p>
<p>   1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance  (John Edward wants to be president)<br />
   2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love  (Admits self-love and seems to loving to preen)<br />
   3. believes that he or she is &#8220;special&#8221; and unique  (obviously)<br />
   4. requires excessive admiration (obviously)<br />
   5. has a sense of entitlement  (ran again after losing with Kerry, believes he DESERVES to be VP)<br />
   6. is interpersonally exploitative (used his wife&#8217;s cancer and love to gain sympathy while destroying her love with adultery)<br />
   7. lacks empathy (doesn&#8217;t care that he has forever defined his children&#8217;s lives  with his adultery)<br />
   8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her (everybody want to be me!)<br />
   9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes (claimed he was 99% honest if  Enquirer was 99% wrong!)</p>
<p>So, let John Edwards call himself a narcissist.  Obviously, someone has told him this in the past. So, if you voted for Edwards, then you have to ask yourself why you would put the United States in the hands of such a person?  </p>
<p>Of course, if John Edwards was smart, he&#8217;d have claimed that Rielle was simply a surrogate holding his baby (from artificial insemination).  Elizabeth had full knowledge and expected the child to be turned over, but John was meeting with Rielle after she reconsidered. This explanation even covers the money payments.  Well, seems like John really ain&#8217;t too bright!!  Just a poor liar and a cheat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dossier</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-3247</link>
		<dc:creator>Dossier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-3247</guid>
		<description>Edwards&#039; physican is using way too much Botox in his forehead.

He&#039;s almost paralyzed and incapable of movement in the upper third of his head, plus he has a very wonky right eyebrow (on the left when you look straight at him).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards&#8217; physican is using way too much Botox in his forehead.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s almost paralyzed and incapable of movement in the upper third of his head, plus he has a very wonky right eyebrow (on the left when you look straight at him).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BA</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-3246</link>
		<dc:creator>BA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-3246</guid>
		<description>Rose said: &quot;that he had no idea who was the dude with the baby in the picture&quot;. Edwards&#039; right answer would have been: there is nothing wrong for a normal person to hold somebody else&#039;s baby in his arms. It&#039;s done all the time by uncles, aunts, brothers, sisters, etc. Of course this would not have helped him that much. 

How many look-alike men were in that room at that time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose said: &#8220;that he had no idea who was the dude with the baby in the picture&#8221;. Edwards&#8217; right answer would have been: there is nothing wrong for a normal person to hold somebody else&#8217;s baby in his arms. It&#8217;s done all the time by uncles, aunts, brothers, sisters, etc. Of course this would not have helped him that much. </p>
<p>How many look-alike men were in that room at that time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rose</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>John Edwards said on nightline that he was at the hotel in Beverly Hills, but that he had no idea who was the dude with the baby in the picture.   John Boy is just a compulsive liar!!!  The reporter should have said, &quot;Why, it&#039;s you, Mr. Edwards.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Edwards said on nightline that he was at the hotel in Beverly Hills, but that he had no idea who was the dude with the baby in the picture.   John Boy is just a compulsive liar!!!  The reporter should have said, &#8220;Why, it&#8217;s you, Mr. Edwards.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imtoast</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-scandal-the-many-faces-of-contrition/comment-page-1/#comment-3242</link>
		<dc:creator>imtoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2131#comment-3242</guid>
		<description>He is so darned botoxed that I can&#039;t tell anything by the face.  The rest of the body needs to be in the pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is so darned botoxed that I can&#8217;t tell anything by the face.  The rest of the body needs to be in the pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
