The Worldwide Leader in Weird ~ News - Politics - Weird News - Crime - Scandals - Celebrities - Video

John Edwards Scandal: How the Enquirer Beat Edwards in His Biggest Trial

If you're new to DBKP, you may want to subscribe to the DBKP.com RSS feed. Thanks for stopping by!



Your Ad Here

Court of Public Opinion:
How the National Enquirer beat John Edwards in the biggest trial of his life

National Enquirer vs. John Edwards

NE vs. JE

Clinton resurrectionist and spin doctor, Lanny Davis, wrote a book on resurrecting Bill Clinton, subtitled “Tell it early, Tell it all, Tell it yourself“.

That Davis subtitle is an effective blueprint for dealing with public scandal.

John Edwards could’ve used that book two weeks ago, as his fifteen-minute confession to ABC’s Bob Woodruff was debunked almost before it even aired, and may go down in history as the benchmark for insincere attempts at avoiding consequences of one’s actions.

“What a strange and insincere admission,” mused some.

“The timeline’s doesn’t match known events,” said others.

Still others claimed Edwards had injected Botox into his face to prevent him from telegraphing true emotion that could be analyzed by experts.

[Background information: access over 100 DBKP stories on the John Edwards-Rielle Hunter affair, scandal and cover-up: John Edwards Love Child Scandal Library.]

John Edwards had been beaten by an opponent that had read his playbook and had analyzed every game he ever played. Not only had the Enquirer set the trap to collect evidence on Edwards, they laid the groundwork for Edwards to paint himself into a corner from which his political career and public image could never escape intact.

Edwards constructed an elaborate cover up, based on classic Prisoner’s Dilemma game theoryif everyone kept their mouth shut and denied the facts until the end of time, nothing could be proven, and minimum penalties would accrue.

But there were too many players for Edwards to control, and in the end his website-scrubbing team of political cleanup hitters vastly underestimated both the sheer volume of evidence connecting Edwards to Rielle Hunter, and the sheer flakiness of his girlfriend and her network of yoga-loving, Hollywood wannabes.

But, there were two masterstrokes on the part of the National Enquirer: the first being the strategic underrepresentation of collected evidence; and the second being the blurred presentation of the “spy photo” of “former presidential contender holding his infant daughter, Frances Quinn Hunter, at the Beverly Hilton hotel”.

The Enquirer resurrected its Edwards Lovechild story on July 21 with eight-month-old stock photography and vague references of confirming sources. Edwards probably knew he’d left some evidence behind. Had he wiped all his fingerprints clean from the inside of the basement restroom door of the Beverly Hills Hilton? He left the restroom under guard with his coat covering his head… was there a telltale watch, freckle or scar? Had Enquirer photographers managed to take his picture in the brief moment before he’d run to the restroom?

Edwards needed more information before he made his next move and he curtailed public appearances, and refused comment other than to decry the “lies told by tabloid trash”, a move cited widely by his supporters as a denial.

Then the other shoe fell.

The Enquirer ran the blurry “spy photo” of John Edwards holding the baby. Was it real? Was it fake?

Many Scandal followers cried “fake” in unison at a photo with the potential to be anyone from Bronson Pinchot to Janet Reno cradling, what was not necessarily, a human baby.

But John Edwards’ heart had stopped.

He knew the photo was one of him holding the baby at the same hotel–only it had been taken five months earlier. Most likely it had been snapped on March 20, 2008, when Edwards had filmed a late night television appearance for The Tonight Show in California.

Edwards was exposed–or was he?

Was this the best evidence the Enquirer had to offer? Apparently, their July 21 pictures had been useless and this photo… Well, this photo could be anything that John claimed it was.

Maybe this fight wasn’t over.

An image professional I consulted was able to quickly approximate the “John Edwards love child” effect using Adobe Photoshop and a three step combination (1. Smart Blur, 2. Pixellate Mosaic, and 3. Sharpen/Unsharpen mask) turning a crystal clear and good photo into a inconclusive ’spy photo’. Watching him repeat the effect in seconds on three separate photos immediately convinced me that the Enquirer was playing possum.

But Edwards’ inner circle had either given him bad analysis of the March 20 photos, or he chose to ignore it, relying on his courtroom instincts. Anyone who’s ever set up a video camera system can tell you how hard it is to capture a license plate, and Edwards apparently concluded that the Enquirer’s photos of him holding Frances Quinn were either poorly lit or somehow corrupted.

And so Edwards laid out his confessional strategy based on the assumption that he had a leak that was not Rielle Hunter, but the Enquirer probably had nothing other than a blurry picture.

The “Confession”

There were three important parts to the confession.

1. The affair was over before he announced his run for the 2008 presidency;

2. His wife, Elizabeth, was at peace with the turn of events and had full knowledge of the event during his 2008 campaign; and,

3. He’d admit he had a ‘liason’ with that woman, but he wouldn’t admit a sexual relationship, paternity, or anything that could possibly bite him in the buttocks later in court.

The rest is history.

One of the least-sincere and least-believable confessions in public memory, newsmen everywhere retrieving Rielle Hunter photos that busted the timeline, plus a widespread public revulsion at the realization that, not only had Elizabeth Edwards’ illness been exploited for political gain, she had been a willing co-conspirator in the cover-up.

John Edwards has a final chance at redemption, but time is of the essence.

Edwards has to come forth immediately, tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

He must then immediately enter a legitimate private rehabilitation center for either drug abuse or sexual addiction (doesn’t matter which). Over time, he can gradually resume public life, maybe even starting a foundation to help deadbeat dads make amends.

Eventually Elizabeth and Rielle can even learn to be family. Would Jack and Emma love to have a little sister?

Let the healing begin.

Again.

by dossier
images: dbkp file; unbossed; National Enquirer

Bookmark and Share:
Sphere: Related Content


Tagged as: , , , , , , , , , ,

DBKP - The Worldwide Leader in Weird

↑ Grab this Headline Animator for your webpage OR
Click the banner to grab DBKP's News Feed for Yourself!

Comments

  • tiny dancer said:

    Well done! Great synopsis of the recent duel between the National Enquirer and John Edwards. As far as “tell it early, tell it all, tell it yourself” goes, Edwards is 0 for 3.

    I certainly don’t believe the assumption that Edwards had had botox injections prior to the Nightline interview. While watching the interview, I was reminded of the theory that raised eyebrows while answering a question can mean deception. If his eyebrows had gone any higher during that interview, they would have joined his hairline!

    Keep up the good work!

    [Reply]

  • Mosh said:

    It would greatly beneift JE, IMHO, if he came clean and stated that he fell in love with Ms. Hunter and of course they conceived a child. Love happens!!

    It appears that JE e is no longer in love with his wife and probably wants out of the marriage but it’s way too complicated now for him to just leave. His wife’s illness is a big factor and let’s not forget his young children (why do people in their very late 40’s or early 50’s decide to have children?)

    It seems that the key players in this story are all miserable. Elizabeth Edwards has to come to terms with the fact that her husband really does not want to be with her. Rielle Hunter, apparently, is constantly being uprooted and attempting (poorly) to hide from everyone. John Edwards’name is mud, and even worse, his freedom to roam and see Rielle has been truncated.

    [Reply]

  • Who da daddy said:

    Rielle is probably mad that the media is focusing on the VP picks now, instead of continuing to ratchet up the pressure on Elizabeth Edwards to “hurry up and die” or toss the lying, cheating bum out. I wonder what kind of log she’ll be throwing on the fire this week in her continuing effort to manifest her destiny?

    [Reply]

  • Norman said:

    “I’m going to be rich and famous, I’m going to meet a rich and powerful man. I’m going to manifest it.”

    Rielle Hunter, 2005

    [Reply]

  • Nancy in AK said:

    During his confession, J.E. states that he knows that he couldn’t be the father “because of the timing of events” and says that he’d be happy to take a paternity test. I think he was using words very carefully. What he was saying was, I can’t act like the father at this point in time (because of his commitments to Elizabeth and Jack and Emma Claire), but he wasn’t truly denying that he is Quinn’s bio Dad.

    I wonder what is going on at the Edwards household right now. My guess is that JE is staying in the apartment in the barn and Eliz. is in the main house. I bet she will leave him or they will separate and live separate lives on their large property.

    I think the JE asked his friend ANDREW YOUNG to help him because YOUNG looks like JE AND THEREfore

    [Reply]

  • And then she said said:

    Edwards should have taken a cue from Hugh Grant’s on-air confession. He simply said, ‘we all know there are good things in life and bad things, and I did a bad thing, and there you have it.’ He told it early, he told it all, and he told it himself. And he still has a career.

    At any time, Edwards could have released a statement saying he’s completely out of politics to concentrate on his family, making him no longer public figure, no longer fair game to media–but he jsut had to have one more moment in the spotlight, hoping to somehow leave the door open….super-narcissism.

    So any word on what he’s going to do now? more hedge fund work? corporate law?

    [Reply]

  • M'eh said:

    You can’t just flip a switch an instantly convert yourself from a public to private person.

    Being a public figure is a legal definition that John Edwards meets by all possible definitions and determinations.

    He has been pervasively involved in political events for ten years, and voluntarily pursued the highest elected office in the world twice, and was the Vice Presidential candidate in 2004.

    Any newspaper could draw a cartoon of John Edwards with a three foot long Pinocchio nose dancing under the puppet strings held by Fred Baron, and there is little to nothing John Edwards could do about it.

    In many ways, Prince Charles is less of a public figure than John Edwards.

    [Reply]

  • And then said:

    His future career options may be limited if anyone decides to go after his misuse of campaign funds as part of this whole affair.

    [Reply]

  • PJ said:

    What career?

    [Reply]

  • Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg said:

    ” What career?”

    Why, professional douchebag, of course!

    Couldn’t you see JE with his own talk show? His guests could all be wayward husbands who need advce reconciling with their wives.

    [Reply]