John Edwards Scandal: Edwards is Democrat’s Typhoid Mary
If you're new to DBKP, you may want to subscribe to the DBKP.com RSS feed. Thanks for stopping by!
TYPHOID JOHN, WHERE HAVE YOU GONE?
“Mary Mallon aka Typhoid Mary, was the first person in the United States to be identified as healthy carrier of typhoid fever. Over the course of her career as a cook, she infected 47 people, three of whom died from the disease. Her fame is in part due to her vehement denial of her own role in spreading the disease, together with her refusal to cease working as a cook. She was forcibly quarantined twice by public health authorities and died in quarantine.”
–From Wikipedia.
Poor Mary. Her sad, tragic life has been well documented. But typhoid fever isn’t a thing of the past. In some parts of the world, it’s still quite prevalent. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an estimated 22 million people come down with this dread disease each year, with more than 200,000 related deaths.
In today’s current political climate, for the MSM and the Democratic Party, John Edwards is the modern-day equivalent of Mary Mallon. No one wants to touch him with a ten-foot fireproof pole, if recent published reports are to be believed. Both Radar Online and the New York Daily News have reported that John Edwards has tried to reach out to former staffers, colleagues and supporters to express his regrets over his tawdry behavior and “beg” their forgiveness.
Unfortunately for Edwards, his “phone home” campaign has only incurred the wrath of his former aides. Some won’t even return his messages. The ones that do have apparently told him in no uncertain terms just how bitter and disillusioned they are over how they were deliberately deceived and manipulated.
From NYDN: “I let you down, and I’m sorry,” is a common refrain of these messages, said another top ex-assistant on the receiving end of one of the calls.
“It was kind of pathetic, to tell you the truth,” said the ex-aide, who said he didn’t return the call and doesn’t expect to speak to his former boss again.”
One source who compared notes with other former colleagues said Edwards makes no attempt to justify or rationalize his behavior in these desperate phone conversations. He simply expresses his regret for deceiving them and asks for their understanding and forgiveness.”

Not that its’ been any better for Elizabeth Edwards. Once a figure of sympathy and considered a victim, whatever goodwill she had in the face of her husband’s perfidy, dissipated like a will o’ wisp, when it was revealed that she was well aware of his infidelity and still, incredibly, encouraged his Presidential run. Her actions—or non-actions—has been the fodder of columnists and bloggers alike. It’s even gotten to the point where some leading Democrats strategists have labeled her “complicit” in this sordid saga.
At the just now concluded Democratic Convention, John Edwards name was never mentioned. He was the Invisible Man. His races, his delegates, were scrubbed from the official record. He was supposed to give a prime time speech; now persona non grata, a man without a party; he wasn’t allowed to deliver so much as a Dairy Queen menu. Think of the ignominy: Edwards was once on the short list to be Obama’s Vice President, and if not that, then a shoo-in for a Cabinet post. Now Democrats wouldn’t be able to pick him out of a police line-up if they had a gun to their heads. His political future in shreds, Edwards would be hard pressed to be elected dog-catcher in Mayberry.
From CQ Politics:
“Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., said he thought it was appropriate that Edwards is staying away.
“What John Edwards did was inexcusable and wrong,” Salazar said. “From my point of view as one of the hosts of this convention, I’m glad he’s not here.”
Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., one of the relative handful of congressional members who endorsed Edwards’ 2008 presidential candidacy, said he was “shocked, appalled, upset and disgraced” over Edwards’ conduct, then said he didn’t want to talk about the subject any further.
When a reporter asked House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, D-Md., as he was racing to an event, why Edwards is never being mentioned at the convention, Hoyer stopped in his tracks, and said, “You know why.”
And now not only is Edwards without a party, it now seems he’s without a home. It’s been reported that Elizabeth Edwards has effectively banished Edwards from the family home. He’s allegedly cooling his heels on an “extended vacation” at their summer home on the Figure 8 Island on the Outer Banks (both literally and metaphysically).
Well, at least Edwards has a waterfront view in which to ponder his future, unlike the pitiable Typhoid Mary, who died alone and penniless.
by CB
images: Wikipedia; dpkp file
* CB writes for PJ McIlvaine at www.pjmcilvaine.blogspot.com
Sphere: Related Content↑ Grab this Headline Animator for your webpage OR
Click the banner to grab DBKP's News Feed for Yourself!













Question: Who do you think is the worst cad? John Edwards vs. John McCain
They both share a history of cheating on their wives while the wives were already going through physical ordeals. I believe that McCain made a real practice of skirt chasing, but he has his stock excuse for every shabby thing he has done since he was a prisoner of war. I’m sorry he was a prisoner of war. The whole country is sorry that he was a prisoner of war. But when is he going to take responsibility for his shabby behavior? And is he the guy who complained that Americans were a bunch of “whiners”? Phew!
[Reply]
Phyllis:
McCain’s been a cad, but hasn’t to anyone’s knowledge fathered a baby and tried covering it up.
We’ve written about McCain’s loutishness–though it occurred years ago. It probably won’t be the last time.
However, Edwards only admitted his affair 3 weeks ago. He continues to deny and lie about it. The comparison between McCain and Edwards, while valid in a few respects, isn’t a very good one.
But keep trying.
Thanks for taking the time to read and comment.
[Reply]
Men…stop…now.
You really DO have the legal right to cheat on your wife or girlfriend. There are plenty of societies, good societies, where such caddish behavior would NOT ruin your life as if we were in Victorian England (but even in VIctorian England, such behavior was not reviled so much unless it was admitted to publicly like Edwards did).
All Eunuch males in the USA need to realize that many men are NOT getting married precisely because it is most often the woman who INSISTS on gettting married…and then all the laws and apparently our male journalists and bloggers will hold him to a much harsher standard if he wants to be a little polygamous than if he had NOT done the woman a favor by marrying her.
Guys, it doesn’t make sense to get married if you think like this. Why is Gay Marriage OK but polygamy not OK?
What Edwards did was to practice a little polygamy.
Now don’t slam me for being less moral than you which is probably entirely not the case.
I am just saying that ANY Libertarian needs to STFU about sexual morality, PERIOD.
I do NOT want to hear about this. I am NOT amused that LIBERAL politiicians in 2008 are more sensitive and intolerant about this than ever before.
If you do not like Edwards for his policies, fine, but his private life really is no concern of mine…unless he got laws passed allowing women to unfairly milk their husbands in a divorce.
Wait a minute….Edwards DID help get laws passed unfairly allowing women more power than men to cheat and make fake charges in divorce cases.
Never Mind. This guy is fair game.
[Reply]
People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. How many past presidents did exactly the same thing as Mr. Edwards? I’m only thinking back to FDR, he did, JFK did (so did his brother), Clinton did, Jimmy Carter did it is his heart, Reagan was too old, the current Republican candidate did. I’m sure you can name a lot more than I can so what in the world is the unholy problem? Why is John Edwards treated like a leper? To my mind he wasn’t being hypocritical because although he portrayed family values he didn’t preach it like Republicans do (especially the ones that like to drink and fool around). No he is a very attractive man who simply was seduced by a political groupie, much the way Clinton was. Yes it is a moral failing but believe me it was a very small failing considering the absolute horrors the current leaders of the Administration have unleashed upon an unsuspecting world. The depths of depravity the Republicans have acquiesced in and enabled are so morally and ethically corrupt that nothing but a pact with the devil could hold a candle to it. So if you want to ostracize someone do it to someone who isn’t fit to mingle with decent people and you know who I mean. He and his sidekick hang out in a big white house somewhere.
[Reply]
Archie1954,
Hi Arch!
I think when everything is known, the affair will be seen as the least of things. At least, that the way I see it.
I thought the REAL scandal was the non-investigation of the MSM prior to late July, even though they knew just as much (absent Edwards’ “confession”.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: Edwards is human and humans are frail. However, Edwards’ connection to the massive money the trial lawyers are pouring into American politics (and bundling, and for that, you can thank McCAin-Fiengold in my opinion) is a great way to let the average Joe see how elections are bought with blatant special interest money–by a group that not only games the system, but is ever watchful on how to further break the system for further gaming.
There’s a lot of special interests and I have no problems with most of them. I’m a free speecher and money is political speech. My opinion is: let everyone give what they want, but keep strict track of it and air it out so people know and can talk about it.
I don’t think hypocrisy and sex scandals are the property of any one party. There’s enough to go around for everyone.
Thanks for taking the time to read and comment.
[Reply]