<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards Affair: Why the Public has the Right to Know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/</link>
	<description>The Worldwide Leader in Weird ~ News - Politics - Weird News - Crime - Scandals - Celebrities - Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:11:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cindy McCain Affair: Whispers, Innuendo, and Grainy Photos &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-7326</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy McCain Affair: Whispers, Innuendo, and Grainy Photos &#124; DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-7326</guid>
		<description>[...] DBKP followed the ongoing John Edwards scandal: how the MSM refused to question a candidate for the office of President about a possible mistress. We also wondered: do candidates have the same right to &#8220;privacy&#8221; as private citizens when running for office? And would these same &#8220;standards&#8221; also apply to a spouse of a candidate such as Cindy McCain? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DBKP followed the ongoing John Edwards scandal: how the MSM refused to question a candidate for the office of President about a possible mistress. We also wondered: do candidates have the same right to &#8220;privacy&#8221; as private citizens when running for office? And would these same &#8220;standards&#8221; also apply to a spouse of a candidate such as Cindy McCain? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Every Day, in Every Way, the John Edwards Story Gets Better and Better at Deceiver.com</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator>Every Day, in Every Way, the John Edwards Story Gets Better and Better at Deceiver.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3800</guid>
		<description>[...] this whole thing just a private matter between a husband, a wife, and a political action [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this whole thing just a private matter between a husband, a wife, and a political action [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>Now being reported in the national MSM in Britain:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/john-edwards-his-mistress-the-new-age-guru-and-the-coverup-898994.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now being reported in the national MSM in Britain:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/john-edwards-his-mistress-the-new-age-guru-and-the-coverup-898994.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/john-edwards-his-mistress-the-new-age-guru-and-the-coverup-898994.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3796</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3796</guid>
		<description>Excellent post! The Edwards gave up their right to privacy the minute he ran for President. This was a time bomb waiting to explode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post! The Edwards gave up their right to privacy the minute he ran for President. This was a time bomb waiting to explode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oilers 4Ever</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator>Oilers 4Ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3795</guid>
		<description>Richard, I had completely ignored that issue. Thank you for bringing it up. The life of a caregiving partner is Hell on Earth. I am not kidding. Thanks again for bringing that up. It&#039;s important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, I had completely ignored that issue. Thank you for bringing it up. The life of a caregiving partner is Hell on Earth. I am not kidding. Thanks again for bringing that up. It&#8217;s important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3794</guid>
		<description>&quot;The life of a spousal caregiver is not as easy as one might imagine as they try to help their ill spouse...&quot;

I&#039;m sure it isn&#039;t easy, particularly if you&#039;re catually present &amp; providing care.  John Edwards decided ignobly to make a presidential run, jetting around the country and banging his conveniently vacuous girlfriend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The life of a spousal caregiver is not as easy as one might imagine as they try to help their ill spouse&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it isn&#8217;t easy, particularly if you&#8217;re catually present &amp; providing care.  John Edwards decided ignobly to make a presidential run, jetting around the country and banging his conveniently vacuous girlfriend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>Something many people have been completely ignoring: Elizabeth Edwards&#039; recurring bouts of cancer made John Edwards a spousal caregiver, who had the added stress of chronic illness affecting their relationship. We should all not be so quick to judge. The life of a spousal caregiver is not as easy as one might imagine as they try to help their ill spouse, and cope with the emotional, physical and financial changes brought on by the advent of illness in the family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something many people have been completely ignoring: Elizabeth Edwards&#8217; recurring bouts of cancer made John Edwards a spousal caregiver, who had the added stress of chronic illness affecting their relationship. We should all not be so quick to judge. The life of a spousal caregiver is not as easy as one might imagine as they try to help their ill spouse, and cope with the emotional, physical and financial changes brought on by the advent of illness in the family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3790</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3790</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve often heard various folks comment on how wonderfully varied, complex and diverse the English language is, effortlessly welcoming foreign words and phrases &#039;into the fold&#039;.  The depth of our language is sometimes described as a &#039;bottomless reservoir&#039; of nuance.

I agreed with that sentiment, but no longer, thanks to John Edwards.  I&#039;ve been struggling the last two weeks for words to describe exactly &lt;em&gt;how much&lt;/em&gt; of a douchebag he really is.  And sadly, for the first time I find my native tongue wanting.  The adjectives simply aren&#039;t &#039;there&#039; to accurately describe how much of  a manipulative, calculating, reprehensible, scumbag, liar, phony, narcissistic, empty-suit, jackass he really is.

See that?  My best effort to &#039;capture&#039; the fundamental essence of John Edwards rings completely hollow, like calling the Grand Canyon a &#039;really big ravine&#039;.  I would otherwise be embarrassed by my linguistic impotence, but I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s my fault.  He has simply re-defined the boundaries of douche-baggery, shattering the power of words to define him.  It is, in wierd sort of way, a mark of greatness.  A legacy, if you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often heard various folks comment on how wonderfully varied, complex and diverse the English language is, effortlessly welcoming foreign words and phrases &#8216;into the fold&#8217;.  The depth of our language is sometimes described as a &#8216;bottomless reservoir&#8217; of nuance.</p>
<p>I agreed with that sentiment, but no longer, thanks to John Edwards.  I&#8217;ve been struggling the last two weeks for words to describe exactly <em>how much</em> of a douchebag he really is.  And sadly, for the first time I find my native tongue wanting.  The adjectives simply aren&#8217;t &#8216;there&#8217; to accurately describe how much of  a manipulative, calculating, reprehensible, scumbag, liar, phony, narcissistic, empty-suit, jackass he really is.</p>
<p>See that?  My best effort to &#8216;capture&#8217; the fundamental essence of John Edwards rings completely hollow, like calling the Grand Canyon a &#8216;really big ravine&#8217;.  I would otherwise be embarrassed by my linguistic impotence, but I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s my fault.  He has simply re-defined the boundaries of douche-baggery, shattering the power of words to define him.  It is, in wierd sort of way, a mark of greatness.  A legacy, if you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>I wish Robert Lewis would provide some interpretation. He posts this link all over. Yes, we now know Andrew Young has these issues. Robert, do you think Edwards USED these frailities to extort Young? Did he hold them over his head and therefore convince him to take the fall. Really, Robert, please participate fully. You post this all over the place without commentary. Everyone has their theories... go ahead and tell us yours...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Robert Lewis would provide some interpretation. He posts this link all over. Yes, we now know Andrew Young has these issues. Robert, do you think Edwards USED these frailities to extort Young? Did he hold them over his head and therefore convince him to take the fall. Really, Robert, please participate fully. You post this all over the place without commentary. Everyone has their theories&#8230; go ahead and tell us yours&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Lewis</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/08/john-edwards-affair-why-the-public-has-the-right-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=2283#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>Andrew Young the admitted father of the John Edwards story:    The arrests for worthless checks, DWI, burglary, criminal mischief, the federal tax lien
 
webofdeception.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Young the admitted father of the John Edwards story:    The arrests for worthless checks, DWI, burglary, criminal mischief, the federal tax lien</p>
<p>webofdeception.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
