Larry Sinclair Claims Latest Arrest Obama-Biden Conspiracy
Larry Sinclair is once again in trouble with the law. According to Larry, it’s not his fault but part of a vast Obama conspiracy involving Obama, Joe Biden, Biden’s son, Beau, who’s the Attorney General of Delaware, and the D.C. Metro police and courts.
Sinclair, who was arrested after his press conference at the National Press Club June 18, then released after posting a bond in a Delaware Superior Court the following Monday, has admitted on his website that he is involved in yet another criminal matter in another state, this time Delaware.
Sinclair, who alleges he met up with then State Representative Barack Obama back in November of 1999 for an illegal drug and gay sex tryst, claims the arrest at the end of his press conference was a “set-up” involving not only Senator Obama but also Senator Joe Biden and his son, the Attorney General of Delaware, Beau Biden, the D.C. Metro police and court.
Sinclair claims that he was arrested by D.C. Metro police after they stated they held a “Fugitive From Justice” warrant. Sinclair, who admitted at the time of his arrest that he was in the company of his attorney, Montgomery Blair Sibley, claims the detectives never produced a warrant. Sinclair was held in the D.C. jail until he appeared at a Delaware Superior Court where he was released on bond.
|
Larry Sinclair stories: The DBKP Library of stories on Larry Sinclair, including his allegations of a sex-and-drugs party with Barack Obama in the back of a limo in Gurnee, IL in 1999, his later polygraph tests administered by whitehouse.com and his continuing story of filing lawsuits against Obama and online posters. Part of the DBKP Political Scandals Library involving 2008 presidential candidates. Included are John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards. |
Sinclair, who hasn’t been shy about asking for cash “donations” or “contributions” on his website, claims his arrest was a “set-up” and that he was held in the D.C. Metro jail as a political prisoner. While Sinclair alleges the D.C. cops “lied” when they said they had a Fugitive from Justice warrant, the fact remains that Sinclair was subsequently released on a personal bond in Delaware. Sinclair then called for supporters to pony up more cash for this latest brush with the law, this time for a $10,000 attorney retainer fee.
According to Sinclair, the Delaware Attorney General’s office issued an indictment on February 4. Sinclair’s posted the actual court documents on his website. While at first blush this seems to a clear case of Sinclair being “honest” about what’s going in Delaware, readers can’t help but notice that the court documents only specify that Sinclair is charged with felony theft in excess of $1000 and that allegedly happened on October 16 and that a motel was involved. Sinclair won’t divulge what actually transpired to led to the indictment but maintains he’s innocent and that the charges are a result of the Obama-Biden conspiracy.
A summons was mailed to Sinclair on February 6. When the summons was returned to the state of Delaware on February 11 due to an insufficient address, a Rule 9 Warrant was issued. Sinclair was picked up and arrested by D.C. Metro cops. Sinclair, who has past of filing numerous lawsuits, has yet to announce whether he will sue the D.C. police and courts for false arrest. The fact that his own attorney, Montgomery Blair Sibley, was present when the D.C cops arrived and led Sinclair away, we find interesting. We wondered why Sibley failed to ask the detectives to see a copy of the warrant.
Sinclair, who claims Obama and his supporters are “conspiring” to keep him “silent”, failed to acknowledge that his current legal woes stem from an incident that transpired before he appeared before the general public with his allegations against Obama in a Youtube video at the end of January.
Sinclair claims he hasn’t been in trouble with the law since 1986–he was incarcerated by the state of Colorado until 1997 serving part of a 16 year sentence for what he refers to as “signing his name to someone else’s credit card charge”–is keeping mum on what transpired in Delaware that led to the latest warrant. Sinclair also wanted on a felony fraud warrant out of Colorado from an incident that occurred in 2000. He claims that he is in the process of having that warrant “set-aside”. In a 2004 motion to dismiss, Sinclair claimed he suffered from a terminal illness and severe spine damage. He also claimed his Social Security Disability payments had been discontinued because it had been determined he was a “flight” risk. Sinclair also claimed he and his family had received “death threats” and “threats of physical harm” from the person who filed the charges against him in Colorado that led to the felony fraud charges and subsequent warrant. Sinclair claims the Colorado warrant isn’t applicable to his ongoing accusations against Obama, of illegal drug use, illicit sex, and now murder, that the warrant is applicable only in the state of Colorado, so in Sinclair’s mind, this warrant “doesn’t count”.















[...] –continued from page 1 [...]
Mr. Sinclair’s allegations do not really matter.
Allegations made by a disreputable witness – and Mr. Sinclair is a disreputable witness in light of his fraud-related convictions and charges – need some kind of corroboration to be accepted. The fact that bloggers are attacking Mr. Sinclair only proves that some bloggers might see something in these allegations, and this is neither here nor there.
No corroboration has been made available yet. Wild goose chases do not constitute corroboration.
Reply