Debunking Larry Sinclair: Part II – The Limo Driver — page 2
Debunking Larry Sinclair: The Limo Driver
–page 2, continued
The talk show host on the Right Perspective points out that if the limo driver is a “good” friend of Obama’s, Obama would already know how to locate him:
Host: You said the limo driver is a good friend of Obama, so Obama knows where the limo driver is.
Sinclair: I bet you he’s trying his damnest to remember which friend of his.. I don’t think Obama will find him. Not this fast.”
–The Right Perspective
Why would Sinclair be so sure that Obama wouldn’t be able to “find” the driver?
Sinclair’s original allegations were posted on Youtube, January 23, 2008. Two months later, Sinclair claimed the “name” of the limo driver was provided to “legal counsel”, and that he, Sinclair, refused to “divulge” the name of the driver on the Internet:
“To make clear, the identity of the limo driver has been provided to legal counsel and will be disclosed through the court case. So any further claims that I have never disclosed this information even to my Attorney are in fact untrue.”
–LarrySinclair0926.com – March 20-2008
Yet, on the comment line of Sinclair’s original Youtube video, Sinclair posted the name, P. Multani, as the limo driver in a comment. The comment line has since been removed by Sinclair. We were not the only ones who noted the comment and Sinclair’s naming of the limo driver.
On March 26, a long time supporter of Sinclair’s, Citizen Wells, posted a inquiry on his blog, Citizen Wells, addressing the “name” of the limo driver:
One of the encounters was alleged to be in a limousine from 5 Star Limousine Service in Chicago. Sinclair states that the limousine driver’s name is P Multani. Sinclair has also stated that in the past he has helped illegal aliens. There was a Paramjit Singh Multani, from India, in this country illegally and he was in Chicago around the time of the alleged limousine encounter. Is Larry Sinclair using information he had about an illegal alien and Barack Obama’s schedule to fabricate this story or is this story real.?
Citizen Wells
Citizen Wells once again addresses the P. Multani issue on his blog on April 7:
Sinclair has stated in the past that he helped illegal aliens. He also stated that the name of the limo driver is P Multani. An illegal alien by the name of Paramjit Singh Multani was in this country illegally and a hearing was set for him in Chicago in 2000. This is near the time of the alleged encounter between Larry Sinclair and Barack Obama. Some one commented on this blog several days ago and pointed out that a Paramjit Singh Multani is a licensed taxi driver in Maryland. They provided a link to the site. Does anyone out there have any more information on this?
Wells posts a response from Sinclair:
“Thought you should know I did not state the above was the limo drivers name. That is an assumption that internet warriors for Obama made and claimed.
Thank you,
Larry Sinclair”
Sinclair posts a further comment:
“ADDED BY LARRY:I believe I included a comment that this was an example of people putting other peoples names out there with no facts to back it up. I can state that no I did not help this individual enter the US nor did I ever state he was my limo driver or that he worked for five star. I will tell you flat out this is not the driver.”
Sinclair held a press conference at the National Press Club on June 18 where he “revealed” the limo driver’s “name”–five full months after Sinclair’s allegations were first posted on Youtube:
From Sinclair’s press release statement:
“On November 6, 1999 after picking me up at the Hotel in Gurnee-and this is significant-Paramjit Multani used his cellphone to make a call. That call was made to then-Illinois State Senator Barack Obama to set up an introduction between me and Senator Obama.”
Sinclair claimed this was the first time he revealed the name of the limo driver:
On November 6, 1999, I asked the limo driver–whose name I now reveal for the first time–Paramjit Multani….
At the conclusion of his press statement, Sinclair challenges participants to “corroborate” his evidence and to find the limo driver:
“It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story by locating the limo driver -Parajmit Multani.”
Later, after releasing his press statement, Sinclair claimed on his website, LarrySinclair.org, the limo driver’s name released in his press conference, Parajmit Multani, was a “typo” and that the actual name was not Parajmit, but Jagir.
** Typo Correction ** Limo Driver’s name is JAGIR P MULTANI
Strange, to say the least–as Sinclair had claimed he was in contact with the driver–that he couldn’t remember the correct first name.
To date, the driver–Sinclair’s chief witness, the one person who could supposedly corroborate his allegations–has not been “officially” located.
On his blog, Sinclair has directed supporters to search for info on detractors–Sinclair is famous for posting personal info such as names, home addresses, tax records, places of employment, children’s names, ect., on his site-yet, there’s not one single instance where he’s asked his supporters to help find the limo driver.
–Hat tip: Glix
Almost every part of Larry Sinclair’s story about the limo driver has changed: the more Sinclair has “refined” his tale, the more confusing it has become for those interested, like Larry, in the “truth”.
* Sinclair claimed the driver was a “personal” and “good friend” of Obama’s, but that if the driver “came forward”, Obama would “shut him down”.
* Sinclair has alluded that the limo driver was scared to come forward, because then, Obama would be able find him to harm him or his family. But, if the limo driver were a “personal friend” of Obama’s, Obama would already know where to find him, as the host of the Right Perspective quickly pointed out back in February. The limo driver was able to locate Obama–somewhat easily, it would seem–in 1999 to buy some coke for a stranger, Larry Sinclair.
At least, according to Sinclair’s own words.
* Larry claimed that he had the same limo driver all three nights. Then, he claimed that he didn’t.
* Sinclair claimed the driver and Obama told him that it would be “more convenient” to drop Sinclair off at the hotel in Gurnee first. Earlier, he claimed that this was the limo driver’s idea.
* Sinclair claimed he was releasing the name of the driver, Parajmit Multani, “for the first time” at his press conference in June–even though he posted it on his Youtube comment thread back in January. Even though he specifically told Citizen Wells in April that Parajmit Multani “was not the name of the driver”. Sinclair then claimed the Parajmit Multani name was a typo, that the “correct” name was “Jagir” P. Multani.
* Finally, after claiming that he was in “contact with the limo driver”, he said it was up to others to locate this shifting, mysterious being.
In a curious fashion note, Sinclair claimed that after visiting the “upscale” lounge with Obama for drinks and chit chat, he lost his baseball cap when he stood up through the moon roof of the limo.
To date, Sinclair’s chief witness, the limo driver, has yet to “come forward”. Sinclair now claims it’s up to “others” to “find” the driver. Sinclair, who first claimed he was in contact with the driver, named Parajmit Multani in his press release–even though he emphatically told Citizen Wells that this “was not the name of the driver”. Finally, Sinclair claimed that “Parajmit” was a typo: the driver’s real first name now was “Jagir”.
Lastly, why has Sinclair never once asked his supporters on his website to help “search” for the limo driver–even though he’s asked numerous times for help in “exposing” detractors’ IP and home addresses, and places of employment?
To those who might say this is nit-picking, we say: Larry Sinclair can remember minute details–such as the liquor in the limo and a street name (Rush) when it suits him. His story is a collection of such details–all designed to give the story believability. When these details change–once, twice or more–logically, shouldn’t this detract from the story’s believability?
Some details are important to Sinclair’s story: either he had the same driver for all three nights or he didn’t; either he released the limo driver’s name at his press conference for the first time or he didn’t; either the limo driver was a “close personal friend of Obama’s” or he wasn’t; either Sinclair’s story is true or it isn’t.
All we have to go on is Larry’s own words–and, as any reader can see, they are contradictory and confusing words.
Sinclair’s sole remaining “proof” is his purported stay at the Choice Hotel in Gurnee, Illinois, covered in Part III by DBKP.
By LBG
notes by Mondoreb
Back to Page 1
DBKP.com Front Page
ALSO at DBKP.com: Part 1 Debunking Larry Sinclair: Obama Accuser Allegations Based on Time Travel
Source – Jeff Rense Show
Source – Jim SumpterShow
Source – The Right Perspective
Source - KTLK 2-18-08
↑ Grab this Headline Animator for your webpage OR
Click the banner to grab DBKP's News Feed for Yourself!





TELL DBKP! SEND US A TIP!






Just tried to comment on your blog.
Wells
Reply
Stay Safe CW, Stay Safe.
Reply
The most damning thing to me was that his handout said Paramjit Multani and IT WAS A TYPO! There he is at the BIG press conference that’s supposed to get out the word and the one witness that everyone has been waiting to be revealed is the limo driver and HE HAS A TYPO IN THE NAME. I mean if there is anything you would be sure that was correct it would be THE NAME OF THE LIMO DRIVER. And how many times did he say he talked to and/or promise to produce this limo driver? Too ridiculous to fathom……
Reply
Ginn, nice job putting the puzzle together bits at a time in a readable fashion, once again.
Reply
Once again, great analysis Ginn! And thanks for the hat tip!
Reply
You will find the truth on my site.
Reply
Actually it’s not unusual to know a person by a nickname rather than their legal name.
Reply