UN Human Rights Council Recommends UK Get Rid of Queen
The United Nations has ruled that the UK should consider abolishing the monarchy. Needless to say, the Queen is not amused.
According to the Daily Express, the UN Human Rights Council has decreed that the UK must “consider holding a referendum on the desirability or otherwise of a written constitution, preferably republicanâ€.
Just who are the members of the United Nations Human Rights Council? In March of 2006 the United Nations General Assembly voted overwhelming on a resolution, setting up a “new” Human Rights Council replacing the “old” Human Rights Commission. Members include Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, and Cuba.
The United Nations Human Rights Council, well known for having countless meetings which have never solved a single issue other than scheduling the next useless meeting, spent the day putting the United Kingdom Ambassador to the UN, Peter Gooderham, through the wringer.
“Algeria thanked the United Kingdom for accepting to address the high incarceration rate of children; however they encouraged the United Kingdom to review more thoroughly the painful techniques applied to children and to harmonize them with their human rights obligations.” United Nations Press Release
That’s right, Algeria, the country which Amnesty International proclaimed human rights abuses “shockingly high” in 2003:
“The level of violence and number of reports of human rights abuses in Algeria continues to be shockingly high, and the ability and willingness of the Algerian authorities to assure protection remain largely elusive.”
The International Save the Children Alliance urged the UK to “introduce legislation banning physical punishment in the home”. Evidently a quick pat on the bum is considered “abuse”. They also declared that poverty in the UK was “unacceptably high”.
The Islamic Human Rights Commission weighed in claiming :
“In particular they highlighted that a secure society could not be built on compromising on due process on human rights and civil rights. The ever increasing time of pre-charge and pre-trial detention had been raised in a variety of consultations. There was particular concern since a bill to increase pre-charge detention from 28 days to 42 days was presented before parliament. The need for this had never been identified, and Britain had the longest pre-charge detention limit in a liberal democracy. The Islamic Human Rights Commission also recommended the review of anti-terrorism laws in light of the highest human rights standards. The implementation of anti terror laws resulted in racism and religious profiling which was evident in disproportional representation in stop and search statistics.”
We disagree, the UK is responding to a time of terrorist attacks on its own soil by people claiming to represent Allah, the God of Islam. Political correctness will not help build a more “secure society”.
The United Nations, in recommending the United Kingdom hold a “referendum” on the “desirability of a constitution” has signaled the ultimate goal, that of meddling busybody who fails to reign their own “naughty children”, such as the UN Peacekeeping Force in Sudan and their propensity for raping young children.
This should be a wake-up call to those who believe the United States should be under the aegis of the United Nations. In the upcoming Presidential election it’s essential that the candidates be quizzed on what role they believe the United Nations should play in relation to the United States.
In the interim a “comedy of the absurd” continues to play at the headquarters of the UN by way of their commission and their “recommendation” that the UK take another look at its centuries old government and its time-honored monarchy. The council, who until two years ago was a commission, contains members whose countries are run by dictators, whose countries harbor terrorists, and whose countries have been cited by Amnesty International for their own homegrown human rights abuses.
Perhaps the most egregious part of this whole tour-de-farce is that American taxpayers fund a hefty portion of the United Nations. Without the billions of American dollars funneled into UN coffers, the UN would be forced out of business. In the case of the UN we haven’t got what we paid for. We continue to pay while the members of the UN play.
By LBG
Source – United Nations Human Rights Council
Source – Daily Express – Abolish the Monarchy UN Report Tells Britain
Image - Queen Elizabeth
Did they also recommend that Saudi Arabia get rid of the Royal Parasites?
Reply
It is very important for the U.N. Human Rights body to stay within their area of jurisdiction. That surely would not extend to the thousand year old sovereignty of the English Royals. If they want to discuss human rights then spend time reviewing the egregious activities of Zimbabwe, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Israel, the U.S. and China. The worst of the worst. The Royal family of England and other European royals are the only thing that stands between a dictatorship of the proletariat in their respective countries and the rule of law and as such must be supported and protected.
Reply
It goes without saying that England should abolish this pathetic monarchy, even if it is only for show.
You simply can’t be one of the world’s leading voices if you are still following traditions that should have already died out. It’s ridiculous.
Reply