<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Reilly Factor Continues to Trounce Olbermann in Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/06/oreilly-factor-continues-to-trounce-olbermann-in-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/06/oreilly-factor-continues-to-trounce-olbermann-in-ratings/</link>
	<description>The WORLDWIDE LEADER in WEIRD ~~~ News -Politics -Commentary -Weird News -Crime -Opinion -Entertainment -Scandals -Celebrities -Conspiracies -Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mondo</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/06/oreilly-factor-continues-to-trounce-olbermann-in-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=1438#comment-10506</guid>
		<description>Vlad,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey, just because you get more viewers doesnâ€™t make you right. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are absolutely right.

The story was more about the dishonesty of the HuffPo&#039;s &quot;reporting&quot;   (a fairly frequent happening).

You make a lot of valid points....thanks for stopping by, reading and commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad,</p>
<blockquote><p>Hey, just because you get more viewers doesnâ€™t make you right. </p></blockquote>
<p>You are absolutely right.</p>
<p>The story was more about the dishonesty of the HuffPo&#8217;s &#8220;reporting&#8221;   (a fairly frequent happening).</p>
<p>You make a lot of valid points&#8230;.thanks for stopping by, reading and commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad303</title>
		<link>http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/06/oreilly-factor-continues-to-trounce-olbermann-in-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10504</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad303</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deathby1000papercuts.com/?p=1438#comment-10504</guid>
		<description>Hey, just because you get more viewers doesn&#039;t make you right. Olbermann&#039;s presentation is boring. He refuses to put on guests of opposing view....for better or for worse. Some say it&#039;s because he is too chicken to debate someone who disagrees with him, Keith says it&#039;s because it&#039;s unproductive to get into a shouting contest on TV for ratings.

With that said, O&#039;reilly not only attracts people that agree with him, he also attracts people that disagree. People who want him to say something outrageous or non-factual so they can post it on youtube. His presentation attracts all kinda people and that&#039;s why he is dominant.

If he presented his facts 100% and nobody had to correct him all the time.....he would slip in the ratings. Olberman mostly doesn&#039;t say anything that can be corrected, including in his Worst person segment........and therefore people get turned off because they can&#039;t connect to him. O&#039;reilly even responds to mail and people tune in, in hopes of their question being answered. Olberman needs something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just because you get more viewers doesn&#8217;t make you right. Olbermann&#8217;s presentation is boring. He refuses to put on guests of opposing view&#8230;.for better or for worse. Some say it&#8217;s because he is too chicken to debate someone who disagrees with him, Keith says it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s unproductive to get into a shouting contest on TV for ratings.</p>
<p>With that said, O&#8217;reilly not only attracts people that agree with him, he also attracts people that disagree. People who want him to say something outrageous or non-factual so they can post it on youtube. His presentation attracts all kinda people and that&#8217;s why he is dominant.</p>
<p>If he presented his facts 100% and nobody had to correct him all the time&#8230;..he would slip in the ratings. Olberman mostly doesn&#8217;t say anything that can be corrected, including in his Worst person segment&#8230;&#8230;..and therefore people get turned off because they can&#8217;t connect to him. O&#8217;reilly even responds to mail and people tune in, in hopes of their question being answered. Olberman needs something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

