One more thing.. How exactly do you know what records Larry gave to the police.. Are you part of Baracks team to try to silence the truth about Barack…Also.. Larry’s mistakes took place in the 1980s.. He is not a career criminal…..Quite typical of Barack to lie and accuse his accusers..

You are right that IF Young contacted Larry, the phone records would certainly lend a huge amount of weight to the story – -so WHY has Larry made so little (if any) effort to produce those phone numbers and records of the calls and messages?. IF he really had gotten those calls LARRY himself would have HAD records of Young’s calls & text messages sent to Larry’s cell phones – -with phone numbers, call dates and times and the messages – this info would be IN his cell phones! The phone numbers and dates/ times would also be on his phone bills . Even if the calls were all from restricted numbers, Larry would still have the text messages he claims to have received and info on the times and dates of the calls, and would be able to say that the number was restricted.

Even if he had not bothered to keep track of those calls, had not saved the records of incoming calls on his phones, had not saved his phone bills for Sept-Dec. 2007…. it is nearly impossible to believe that after early March when he heard of Donald Young’s murder , he would not have made a MAJOR effort to get those phone records!. Usually it is quite simple to access your phone bills for the past several months online. IF he were telling the truth, why would Larry postpone trying to get these records????. Yet at the PC in June, I think he said he had been trying for 2 weeks to get the records from Sprint. 2 weeks???? Why not 3 months?!

All he gave police and journalists were some numbers he said were his OWN numbers. He could have saved the police work by getting info for them off his own phones or phone bills. And how does he expect journalists to somehow figure out who all called him? HE’s the person most able to get that information. It sure does not sound to me like someone who has important evidence and really wants to reveal it….. sounds a lot more like someone trying to string people along for months and get donations.

Even without the murder it’s hard to believe Larry would not have bothered to save his only evidence that the Obama campaign actually responded to his calls, and would not have published that …… But, as I pointed out before, Larry himself said repeatedly that NOBODY had EVER responded to his calls to the campaign.

I just think it is a shame that people are taken in by this conman. And nobody in this world makes Larry look like “a patron of truth” –he has been ripping people off all his adult life and probably started as a juvenile.

Not to mention, how do you explain that Larry stated on multiple occasions that NOBODY ever returned his calls to the Obama campaign. He said that was why he made his You Tube video. He kept telling that story until he heard in a comment on his blog in March that Donald Young, a gay choirmaster from TUCC, had been murdered. It was only then he changed his story to say that Young had returned his calls to the campaign.
It’s easy to make up stories about people who are dead and can’t deny them. Larry is a liar. His contradictions about Donald Young made a lot of people see through him. I hope you’ll be able to do the same.

Either way, great article! I have thoroughly enjoyed all of your posts concerning the Larry Sinclair Charade!

Jeffrey Pierce
Columbus, Ohio