Now if I’m right, you didn’t “decide” anything.

It’s something you are, or are not (though the question can be complex for some Intersexed people, with bodies neither wholly male nor female). In fact, you might think that the question is offensive, and if so, you have my apology. It wasn’t meant to be, it was to show you the logical consequences of your position on the matter.

Your point about those on the left “ignoring inconvenient facts” that don’t fit their narrative is a good one. But incomplete, because all too many on the right do the same, do they not?

Read what a.mcewan had to say, for example. How do you refute Sportin Life’s accusation?

She boasts of good manners and a decent upbringing, but she’s off by a long shot on both counts.

http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/30/6/1499

Also, Reisman did not refute any of Kinsey’s work. She accused the Institute of several things, the Institute refuted her accusations, she sued the Institute, the Institute won

I know the topic’s getting old, so I’ll drop it after this, but I wanted to comment on this last statement.

The vast, vast majority of gay people do keep their privates to themselves. Discussion of sexuality or something like gay marriage, is not the same as discussion of specific sex acts.

As for the previous mention of the Folsom street fair. . .talk about an extreme example. It’s like trying to use Mardi Gras or “Girls Gone Wild” or Paris Hilton as examples of typical heterosexuality. Not fair, right?

OK, peace out.

And yes, it’s very helpful to characterise everybody who disagrees with the fanciful twaddle in this article as ignorant of the facts without actually providing any of your own. That really lends your case weight.