TELL DBKP! SEND US A TIP!
Color Me Homophobic
CULTURE WATCH by Nancy Morgan
The powers that be have decreed that homosexuality and all its variations are normal, and woe to anyone who dares question this alternate lifestyle. Homosexuality has been added to the list of topics, along with race and global warming, that is off limits for discussion. The debate has been declared over.
Homosexuality, which not very long ago was defined as a “disorder” in medical journals, is well on its way to becoming a lifestyle option. Despite the fact that it is based on a premise which has been thoroughly discredited.
The normalization of homosexuality has its genesis in 1948, when Alfred Kinsey published the first ever study of male human sexuality. Entitled the Kinsey Report, this research involved illegal sexual experimentation on several hundred young children. It was based on a non–representative group of Americans — including hundreds of sex offenders, prostitutes, prison inmates and exhibitionists. This research purported to show that infants and children are sexual beings and could enjoy and benefit from sexual activity, especially with adults. Kinsey’s research has never been duplicated or verified. Indeed, if someone tried, they would be jailed for child abuse. No matter.
Fast forward 60 years. This debunked research still serves as the official sex education doctrine in the United States and has been adopted as the foundation of modern “sex science.” Kinsey’s claim that one in 10 people are homosexual has been accepted by our government and society at large, despite having been proven totally false. Kinsey’s assertion that all sex is natural and all societal limits are unnatural is accepted by large segments of mainstream America.
Government schools, under the guise of tolerance, are actively recruiting young impressionable children and teens to the gay lifestyle. Just last Friday, government schools across the country held a “Homosexual Day Of Silence”. This blatant indoctrination was not open to discussion, at least not to parents. A principal in a Massachusetts school decreed that support for homosexuality was approved, but ‘condemnation’ was banned. Can you spell censorship?
Businesses have also jumped aboard the gay bandwagon, both supporting and promoting the gay message. The most recent example being last week’s episode of Days of our Lives where two sensitive young men engage in deep throat kissing. Thank-you, Procter and Gamble.
And thank you, Children’s Hospital in Boston. They have launched a program that actually gives drugs to pre-teens in order to delay puberty. The reason? They want to give the child more time to decide if they want to be male or female. That’s right. Gender is now optional.
Personally, I cringe when I see two guys swapping spit. Or when half naked transsexuals flaunt their sexuality in public places. I always wonder what they’re celebrating. A lifestyle that takes 20 years off your life? A dangerous, deadly and costly way of life that effectively undermines traditional families? The fact that gays and lesbians experience twice the partner abuse of straight couples? No, they’re celebrating their empowerment, leaving all other Americans to pay the social and financial costs involved. After all, they’ve got rights.
I’ve got rights, too. I have the right to pick my nose in public and wave it in someone else’s face (unless they’re gay or black – then it would be a hate crime). Good manners and a decent upbringing keep me from exercising this right. I also have the right to object when someone shoves their personal sexual habits in my face and demand that I not only tolerate it, but endorse it. That’s just plain rude. Hey, I’m still trying to figure out why weenie waggers are arrested while half nude trans-sexuals sporting fake organs have the right to wave them in public.
Gays are portrayed as victims of an unfeeling society. As such, they have been granted special rights not available to other Americans. The right not to be offended, the right to automatic respect, and the right to offend any person or group that dares to object. Imagine the outcry if Christians were granted these same rights.
The gurus of political correctness have decided that anyone who is not in agreement with the increasingly blatant homosexual agenda is a homophobe. Color me homophobic. I not only disagree with flaunting ones privates in public, I also disagree with exposing this behavior to children and telling them its their right, if not their duty, to put their sexuality above all other considerations.
The fear of being branded homophobic, racist, mean-spirited or any of the other PC labels has effectively silenced millions of Americans. Well, here’s a news flash: Just because you label someone a homophobe or a bigot, doesn’t make them a homophobe or bigot. Besides, isn’t that profiling?
America is a country based on individual rights, not group rights. Americans still have the right to hold opposing viewpoints. We have the right to accept or condemn behavior based on our own moral values. No amount of name calling can take away those rights.
I will accept as legitimate the gay lifestyle only when gays realize that rights come with responsibilities. Societal acceptance implies a social contract. A contract that involves a net benefit to society, an earned respect and an acknowledgment that the rights of one person don’t trump the rights of another.
In the meantime, I have one small request. I’d sure appreciate it if you all would keep your privates to yourselves. That’s just good manners.
by Nancy Morgan
Nancy Morgan is a columnist and a news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina, where she writes “Culture Watch” weekly.
Article may be reprinted with attribution. Bio available on request.
Back to DBKP/Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.
Also posted at DBKP at Blogger.
More from this category
- Glenn Beck: Preferred by 2 out of 3 Who Go to the Mattresses
- Iraq, Afganistan Good News; Nancy Pelosi, Boy Scouts and Mike Nifong
- Memorial Day Blessings, 9000 PhDs Against Global Warming and British Boy Boobs Problems
- Military Recruiting Maxed, Solar Bras and Islamophobia Observatory
More from this author
- Nanny State: Hey Obama, You’re Not My Daddy
- What Obama Has Accomplished: Reality vs Perception
- ClimateGate: Silent Scandal
- Idiots of the Week: November 23 2009
Subscribe to this author
↑ Grab this Headline Animator for your webpage OR
Click the banner to grab DBKP's News Feed for Yourself!
Wonderful! Very well written and argued.
Reply
“The powers that be have decreed that homosexuality and all its variations are normal, and woe to anyone who dares question this alternate lifestyle. ”
Actually, what I question is your meaning by calling my life a “lifestyle” and an alternate one at that. And what variations? I wonder what kind of “gay” I am. . .
“Homosexuality, which not very long ago was defined as a “disorder” in medical journals, is well on its way to becoming a lifestyle option.”
It is actually those on your side of the argument that insist an most of these terms. I had no “option” in my sexuality beyond accepting it. I have no particular lifestyle beyond a suburban one. In fact my life would probably be very, very similar to yours, unless you yourself are a partier. I’m a homebody in a 10-year relationship.
I’m sure your opinion piece here has a lot of people nodding along saying “yep.” I’d bet those people are not gay, and have very few gay friends or acquaintences in their everyday lives. Because none of this reflects in any tiny little way my life or my friends’ lives either.
Especially the 20-years off your lifespan nonsense. However negatively you view Kinsey’s research, what quack did you get that little nugget of information from?
Reply
Just because I don’t like something doesn’t mean I have an “unnatural fear” of it. I don’t like broccoli, does that mean I’m broccoliphobic?
Reply
Mr. Greenlee,
The information that anal sex takes 20 years off of your life is derived from the socratic deduction of known science based on male homosexual activity as recorded by the Federal Government and reported widely in ‘The Advocate” the gay lifestyle magazine.
You may call it a ‘nugget’, but in fact it is the smoking gun that will lead to more deaths and disease and misery of the families that bury their sons due to a ‘choice’ and not a ‘fact’.
Reply
You speak of discredited research. Perhaps you should confirm the origins of the “20 years off your life” myth.
And I believe that there already exists legislation to protect people from discrimination on the grounds of religion, so your comment about gay people being offered rights that are not available to Christians is pretty empty. Incidentally, this is the same disingenuous argument that is often put forward to deny that gay people have a “right” to enter into same-sex marriages. Sure, they can still marry people of the opposite sex and therefore have the same rights as everyone. And anyone can claim protection from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Except Christians are already a “protected class”, in the accepted rhetoric, whereas most gay people are unable to marry their chosen partner.
I’m often surprised at the short-sightedness of people who condemn all gay people on the basis of perceptions developed by exposure to the most visible, media-attracting members of that group. You don’t seem to know that the majority of gay people are not promiscuous and flamboyantly camp exhibitionist sexual predators. But I suppose it’s okay to stereotype, villify and demonise them on the basis of your limited experience. In much the same way that it’s perfectly rational to believe that Christians are all hate-mongers who picket the funerals of soldiers, claiming their death to be a punishment for America’s increasing tolerance of a “deviant” lifestyle.
Reply
Michael, the “recording” of that statistic by the federal Government and its reporting in the Advocate doesn’t actually make it scientifically valid, it may surprise you to note.
The data on which that conclusion is based ( reported in “Modelling the impact of HIV disease on mortality in gay men”, Hogg et al (1997)) are limited, outdated and insufficient to draw such a wide and sweeping conclusion. But hey, a bit of polemic beats the dull truth of actual fact any day, right?
Reply
“The information that anal sex takes 20 years off of your life is derived from the socratic deduction of known science based on male homosexual activity as recorded by the Federal Government and reported widely in ‘The Advocate” the gay lifestyle magazine.”
Big reader of The Advocate, are you? I’d love to see a link, because I belive that “20-year” claim is preposterous. How would you conduct such a study? Did it include heterosexuals who enjoy anal intercourse? What about gays that don’t? And what of lesbians, what’s your beef with them?
Contrary to popular belief, it ain’t all about the anal. Honestly, I think that’s what most anti-gay attitudes come from, fear of anal sex. Tip: treat it like the reality that your parents have sex. . .just don’t think about it.
Reply
James,
Tip: treat it like the reality that your parents have sex. . .just don’t think about it.
Excellent advice.
Good thing to keep in mind at the next Folsom Street Fair.
Thanks for the tip and taking the time to stop by and comment.
Reply
Many of the facts in this article are included in the pictured book. The first to debunk Kinsey was Judith Reisman…her book ‘Kinsey, Sex and Fraud’, was the first of many to debunk Kinsey. But like Alger Hiss, the left ignores any facts that don’t fit their template.
Reply
great work
Reply
Much seems to be made of debunking Kinsey, but I can’t see what that proves. And I would be careful who you cite, Nancy; Dr Judith Reisman holds some extraordinarily unorthodox views that seriously call into question her motivations and credibility as a qualified authority to comment in any meaningful capacity.
And yes, it’s very helpful to characterise everybody who disagrees with the fanciful twaddle in this article as ignorant of the facts without actually providing any of your own. That really lends your case weight.
Reply
Good grief, Nancy! You might consider dropping the homophobic stance at least until a nice gay boy finds you a better wig.
Reply
“In the meantime, I have one small request. I’d sure appreciate it if you all would keep your privates to yourselves. That’s just good manners.”
I know the topic’s getting old, so I’ll drop it after this, but I wanted to comment on this last statement.
The vast, vast majority of gay people do keep their privates to themselves. Discussion of sexuality or something like gay marriage, is not the same as discussion of specific sex acts.
As for the previous mention of the Folsom street fair. . .talk about an extreme example. It’s like trying to use Mardi Gras or “Girls Gone Wild” or Paris Hilton as examples of typical heterosexuality. Not fair, right?
OK, peace out.
Reply
Regarding that claim about homosexuality taking 20 years off of your life, I point everyone to the original researchers of the study when they complained as to how their work was being distorted to make that point. The link is here:
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/30/6/1499
Also, Reisman did not refute any of Kinsey’s work. She accused the Institute of several things, the Institute refuted her accusations, she sued the Institute, the Institute won
Reply
Nancy doesn’t care what the article is really about. Or about the provenance of any of the other “facts” she cites. She uses them only to justify and rationalize her pre-existing superstitions, not to inform herself or her readers. She’ll pick up anything, no matter how shoddy or ridiculous, that will serve as a weapon–feeling, for some reason, unquestionably entitled to vent her hatred and contempt onto total strangers.
She boasts of good manners and a decent upbringing, but she’s off by a long shot on both counts.
Reply
My typical day includes such civilization-destroying events such as work, laundry, housecleaning, etc. Yes, I’m admitting to participating in such dastardly deeds in my own gay way. If, however, these dire actions are indeed undermining Ms. Morgan’s “traditional” family, she is most welcome to come on over and take over on the chores. It’s only to save civilization that I make these sacrifices.
Reply
Since sexuality is a “lifestyle choice”, when did you decide not to be lesbian, Nancy?
Now if I’m right, you didn’t “decide” anything.
It’s something you are, or are not (though the question can be complex for some Intersexed people, with bodies neither wholly male nor female). In fact, you might think that the question is offensive, and if so, you have my apology. It wasn’t meant to be, it was to show you the logical consequences of your position on the matter.
Your point about those on the left “ignoring inconvenient facts” that don’t fit their narrative is a good one. But incomplete, because all too many on the right do the same, do they not?
Read what a.mcewan had to say, for example. How do you refute Sportin Life’s accusation?
Reply
fair flowers county Clearfield county Clearfield rv fair
Reply
I’m curious whether the author has ever met a gay or lesbian person. Such hate is a big burden to carry around. Fortunately, the majority of your readers know that you article wasn’t factual. Try living a little bit. The world is bigger than your small community in South Carolina.
Reply