Barack Obama has graduated from Harvard Law School, chose to go back and work in the community when he could have just gone off and made a fortune, shows a deep understanding of our country and expresses it eloquently. He has done nothing that makes me not believe that he is who I see when I watch him.

Larry Sinclair OTOH is a convicted criminal. I don’t know the whole story of his past. He says he’s been up front by telling you he has a jaded past, but we don’t know him. Having spent a lot of time reading about people who break the law, I know for sure that they can be very believable and everyone who challenges them tends to be a liar. This is what I see from Larry. If he was so concerned about Obama’s use of drugs, he NEVER had to say one thing about a sexual encounter…at all to the public. There are some details he is not willing to disclose. Why not that? Why has the main stream media not picked up on this if it’s true? They have lots of resources to investigate a claim like this. You think that Barack Obama owns the media. Bill Clinton could not surpress the Monica Lewinsky story. Michael Isekoff had it all and trust me, if Larry has the truth on his side, he should contact Isekoff straight off because he’s not afraid to look into anything.

Also, given the fact that Barack Obama had an infant daughter, less than 6 months old at the time of this supposed incident, I find it incredible to believe that he could just go get high on crack and deal with a new baby, life as a legislator, etc, and carry it off. It just does not compute.

One has a past that is marked with achievement in the public realm. The other has a past that is marked with criminality. If I have to use my judgement on who to believe, I’m going with the one who has a sense of obligation to the community rather than one who has in the past ripped it off.